 Former prime minister Jean Chrétien part of secretive project to store nuclear waste in Labrador, emails showEnvironmental | 4305 hits | Apr 01 7:19 am | Posted by: DrCaleb  Emails drafted in 2019 and 2020, obtained by Radio-Canada's Enquête investigative program, reveal a group of business executives have been discussing a secretive project to bury nuclear waste from foreign countries in Labrador.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2021 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2021 by Canadaka.net
Are we then responsible to capture and store other countries emmissions from hydrocarbons?
"The proof is the proof. And when you have good proof, it is because it's proven."
-J.
It's not a 'secret project' if even I have known about it for days. But, Chretien will probably go tell the media that there's no proof of this ever going to happen, because
"The proof is the proof. And when you have good proof, it is because it's proven."
I miss that mangled English. He used it brilliantly when in tight spots.
'Zero possibility' of nuclear waste stored in Labrador, says Furey
Wait until we’re a territory:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfound ... -1.5753353
Problem is, no one takes either seriously. Most of Canada sees how Newfoundland runs itself and laughs. Most Newfies end up going elsewhere in Canada for prosperity. I used to work with a crew of Newfies, and most of them (while being proud Newfoundlanders) often complained about how 'The Rock' is run and how people across Canada view them.
Most of the Newfies I've encountered are hard working and jovial. But, like a lot of Canadians, I just shrug when someone mentions Newfoundland because it always seems to be the world's biggest gong show out there.
-J.
I could see Labrador as a territory, but not both Labrador and Newfoundland. If anything, Labrador should split from Newfoundland and be it's own territory or province.
Problem is, no one takes either seriously. Most of Canada sees how Newfoundland runs itself and laughs. Most Newfies end up going elsewhere in Canada for prosperity. I used to work with a crew of Newfies, and most of them (while being proud Newfoundlanders) often complained about how 'The Rock' is run and how people across Canada view them.
Most of the Newfies I've encountered are hard working and jovial. But, like a lot of Canadians, I just shrug when someone mentions Newfoundland because it always seems to be the world's biggest gong show out there.
-J.
Many Newfoundlanders (not Newfies, Jaysus B’y!) don’t leave and there’s plenty to laugh at in the way Canada is run elsewhere too. The province would look more like others in the rest of the country if it had a big city. It’s basically the same as any other part of outback Canada with many of the same problems. In its favour, it’s the friendliest place this immigrant has ever lived in. If I do have to depart for ‘Upalong’ or back to Europe, I will always miss it.
So, we sell Uranium to other countries. Why does that make us responsible for their waste?
Are we then responsible to capture and store other countries emmissions from hydrocarbons?
It doesn't, and no.
But what does it matter? The only people who'd probably be impacted would the Natives and other rural people who live out there, right?
I mean, it's not like there could be consequences for ranchers, hunters, fishermen or anyone who works in the tourism industry?
Get serious.
/s