news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Commission to consider military death benefit i

Canadian Content
20704news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Commission to consider military death benefit issue


Military | 207040 hits | Jun 07 8:09 am | Posted by: wildrosegirl
24 Comment

The Canadian Human Rights Commission is examining whether Ottawa discriminates against families of single soldiers killed overseas by excluding them from a quarter-million dollar death benefit.

Comments

  1. by avatar andyt
    Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:41 pm
    Presumably the money is meant to help the survivors. This is 2010. Spouses can take care of themselves, so I think the money should only go to soldiers with dependent children (including ones in uni).

    Or, treat it like life insuracne, and as the article says used to be the case, let the soldier designate any beneficiary they wish.

  2. by avatar Yogi
    Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:50 pm
    All military personel should be eligible for this without question. In the case of single members, they should only be required to 'name a beneficiary' whilst married members spouses and children automatically receive the benefits.

  3. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:51 pm
    When the breadwinner for the family is blown to bits its going to take a while to completely change you're life to cope with them not being there.

  4. by avatar EyeBrock
    Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:58 pm
    This is a no-brainer. Give the families of our fallen a load of cash.

    The average military family has to endure hardships that no other government worker or their families go through.

    Besides the danger that the CF guys are exposed to in combat and in training, their families are usually housed in isolated communities in basic accomodation, spouses have restricted employment opportunities and the kids change schools every 2-3 years.

    No life like it eh?

  5. by avatar martin14
    Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:27 pm
    "Yogi" said
    All military personel should be eligible for this without question. In the case of single members, they should only be required to 'name a beneficiary' whilst married members spouses and children automatically receive the benefits.


    agreed.

  6. by avatar andyt
    Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:38 pm
    "Guy_Fawkes" said
    When the breadwinner for the family is blown to bits its going to take a while to completely change you're life to cope with them not being there.


    Well that seems to be the reasoning of the govt in denying the benefit to single soldiers. And, married with no children, the soldier is probably not the only breadwinner either. In fact probably even with children, most spouses probably work.

    So either make it for dependent children only, or let soldiers choose any beneficiary they want. Really the latter seems like a no brainer for somebody that gave their life for their country. If we can't afford that, we can't afford to send them in harm's way in the first place.

  7. by avatar kenmore
    Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:20 pm
    It don't matter if the wife works, no kids etc andyt.. single men do the same job as married and their lives are every bit as important. The benefit should be given to all military.

  8. by avatar gonavy47
    Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:51 pm
    Maybe they could "pare down" the ridiculous amount we are paying senators, so they can then afford to pay the benefit to the survivors of ALL Canadian military personnel, killed while on duty.

  9. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:04 am
    I think its just fine the way it is, they only place that money would go if the soldier had no depandants is the families pockets. $250,000 could put the wife back in school so she can make a decent wage, if that money went to the parents all it would be sunk into is the morgage.

    Personally I think it would be better if it was awarded on a case by case basis. Give a good enough reason why you want the money and you get it, going to school would be a good reason, buying a new RV wouldnt be. This way if a single soldier wanted to put his sibling through school (sorry I cant think of anything else that would be reasonable to spend that much money on) they could.

  10. by avatar putz
    Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:46 am
    $250,000 to support your family or spouse. No family or spouse no money. Seems simple to me. I don't see any soldiers complaining about it the way it is, and we all know they way it is before we go over. This $250,000 is also a stop gap measure in case of no life insurance the family is not high and dry, plus moving out of a PMQ and buying a house with the primary breadwinner (as most military members are)dead is quite the hassle. After all military members can't get plain life insurance policies that cover you in the event of death in a war zone/duty related. If a single guy is really that concerned he can get the SISIP life insurance policy a leave the monies to his parents/gf/whoever.

  11. by avatar EyeBrock
    Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:55 am
    "putz" said
    $250,000 to support your family or spouse. No family or spouse no money. Seems simple to me. I don't see any soldiers complaining about it the way it is, and we all know they way it is before we go over. This $250,000 is also a stop gap measure in case of no life insurance the family is not high and dry, plus moving out of a PMQ and buying a house with the primary breadwinner (as most military members are)dead is quite the hassle. After all military members can't get plain life insurance policies that cover you in the event of death in a war zone/duty related. If a single guy is really that concerned he can get the SISIP life insurance policy a leave the monies to his parents/gf/whoever.


    I disagree. A dead Canadian soldier is no more worthy if he/she is married or not.

    It's easy to achieve. Nominated next-of-kin gets the cash. Before I got married my sister was moninated NOK.

    Most soldiers have a family. Married or not.

    And $250K isn't a huge amount of cash these days. Not in Southern Ontario. That'll just about get you a crappy townhouse where I live.

  12. by avatar Public_Domain
    Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:01 am
    :|

  13. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:45 am
    "Mr_Canada" said
    Hmm.

    Yes, single soldiers should get the same benefit, or else it should be scrapped entirely.

    I have a feeling if the HRC finds this is discrimination that is exactly what will happen.

  14. by Unicornlord
    Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:24 am
    Postings are getting longer and longer, I do not know many people that are moved every three years. To serve is a choice, this is simple greed, when I was deployed single I told my mom I got insurance out in case something happened. She was mortified, she did not want any money from my death. Spouses and children need the money to start thier loves over. Mommy and Daddy to not need to profit from their son's or daughter's death.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net