The unusual B.C. Supreme Court hearing of Shirley Anderson, a 71-year-old woman who is suing her estranged children for support, was adjourned Tuesday after a Vancouver lawyer stepped in at the last minute to offer the siblings some pro bono help.
$750 a month per child? Who has that kinda money. Also she has the balls to ask for it after she abandonded her kids at age 15? Shes definetly a top 10 worst parent.
"Bacardi4206" said $750 a month per child? Who has that kinda money. Also she has the balls to ask for it after she abandonded her kids at age 15? Shes definetly a top 10 worst parent.
I'm not surprised that some poor excuse for a parent would demand support from their kids... what surprises me is that the province may force the kids to pay.
I am sorry, but I don't get where she gets the nerve from to sue her kids. I hope she loses, the kids win, counter sue her for all costs made and emotional stress, plus being a bad parent since they were 15.
Apparently there is a law in B.C. called the Parents' Maintenance Act (section 90 of the Family Relations Act) that was enacted in 1922 which requires children to support their dependent parents. This is the section the fat cow of a mom is suing under. This explains why the judge has ordered the kids to pay $10/month until the case is reviewed (judge still has to follow the law). The law is archaic and needs to be struck down if you ask me. This woman has some balls pulling this stupid stunt, plus what's even more mind-boggling is the bitch has has two other teenage sons at age 71.
$750 a month per child? Who has that kinda money. Also she has the balls to ask for it after she abandonded her kids at age 15? Shes definetly a top 10 worst parent.
I'm not surprised that some poor excuse for a parent would demand support from their kids... what surprises me is that the province may force the kids to pay.
I am sorry, but I don't get where she gets the nerve from to sue her kids. I hope she loses, the kids win, counter sue her for all costs made and emotional stress, plus being a bad parent since they were 15.
I'm thinking those were here teenage grandsons, and it was the daughter in law talking...
Oops, so they are. My bad. Got confused with Sherry and Shirley.
Is there any wonder why Darryl can't be found?
Prison would probably have been alot more stable and loving environment than living with this bitch.