Another failed headline from the Sun. He wasn't jailed for failure to licence a cat, which is not a "jailable" offence. He was jailed for having an outstanding fine; the reason for the fine doesn't have any bearing on the sentence.
"BeaverFever" said Another failed headline from the Sun. He wasn't jailed for failure to licence a cat, which is not a "jailable" offence. He was jailed for having an outstanding fine; the reason for the fine doesn't have any bearing on the sentence.
He also turned himself in, was given the option of pay the fine or go to jail.
"BeaverFever" said Another failed headline from the Sun. He wasn't jailed for failure to licence a cat, which is not a "jailable" offence. He was jailed for having an outstanding fine; the reason for the fine doesn't have any bearing on the sentence.
I wouldn't pay a fine for a cat I didn't own, either. I imagine some lawyer will now take up the case and get it handled at a significant cost to the town.
Another failed headline from the Sun. He wasn't jailed for failure to licence a cat, which is not a "jailable" offence. He was jailed for having an outstanding fine; the reason for the fine doesn't have any bearing on the sentence.
He also turned himself in, was given the option of pay the fine or go to jail.
Another failed headline from the Sun. He wasn't jailed for failure to licence a cat, which is not a "jailable" offence. He was jailed for having an outstanding fine; the reason for the fine doesn't have any bearing on the sentence.
I wouldn't pay a fine for a cat I didn't own, either. I imagine some lawyer will now take up the case and get it handled at a significant cost to the town.
There's a mechanism for disputing fines, simply refusing to pay is not it. Some people are their own worst enemies.
So are some governments.