Major accounting firms known as the "Big Four" routinely hired senior Canada Revenue Agency enforcement executives and Department of Justice tax lawyers over a span of more than a decade, a CBC News investigation has found.
Suspect, yes. Unusual, no. The Cons gutted the CRA, didn't seem interested in collecting taxes. The Libs are talking a good game, but my guess is that's all it will be.
"andyt" said Suspect, yes. Unusual, no. The Cons gutted the CRA, didn't seem interested in collecting taxes. The Libs are talking a good game, but my guess is that's all it will be.
Another reason I was disliking Harper's strategy. Why gut one of the few revenue positive ministries? Stack it! Make them bring in every dime the government has owed to it.
"DrCaleb" said Why would anyone think this was abnormal ?
Indeed. My CPA is a former IRS auditor. That's why I've worked with him for some 15 years.
So, you guys don't think that hiring a senior CRA official at the same time that the CRA is investigating the company is at all unusual?
If nothing else, it's politically suspect.
Are you really that naive ?
So many go from the Ministry to private business, and the other way around.
Follow any middle - senior official in government, they all wind up in a business or pressure groups. The health industry is particularly good at this.
My tax guy; the bottom half of his graduating class are in government Ministries. They all know each other, all friends. Can you figure the rest out ?
Indeed. My CPA is a former IRS auditor. That's why I've worked with him for some 15 years.
So, you guys don't think that hiring a senior CRA official at the same time that the CRA is investigating the company is at all unusual?
If nothing else, it's politically suspect.
Are you really that naive ?
So many go from the Ministry to private business, and the other way around.
Follow any middle - senior official in government, they all wind up in a business or pressure groups. The health industry is particularly good at this.
My tax guy; the bottom half of his graduating class are in government Ministries. They all know each other, all friends. Can you figure the rest out ?
Martin, I work in Government. Department of Finance, to be exact. Many other departments in the past. I see public sector hiring good government people all the time. And government does the same to them.
But a company under investigation usually has better sense than to hire one of the people doing the investigation! Can you not see the conflict of interest here?
"DrCaleb" said But a company under investigation usually has better sense than to hire one of the people doing the investigation! Can you not see the conflict of interest here?
I didn't see anything in the article about a current investigation. Besides, they normally have to wait at least one year... officially.
^^ What he wrote. It was in the 'related articles' section.
A senior tax enforcer left the Canada Revenue Agency and joined the upper echelons of KPMG at the same time as the government was pursuing the accounting firm in court, alleging it had set up a deceptive offshore "sham" to help wealthy clients avoid tax.
"DrCaleb" said ^^ What he wrote. It was in the 'related articles' section.
A senior tax enforcer left the Canada Revenue Agency and joined the upper echelons of KPMG at the same time as the government was pursuing the accounting firm in court, alleging it had set up a deceptive offshore "sham" to help wealthy clients avoid tax.
You two really expect me to follow all the CBC self linking chest beating ?
Please.
Anyhoo,
In an email to CBC News, CRA spokesperson Philippe Brideau said former executives must not accept employment with "an entity" with which they had "significant" dealings while at the agency for a period of at least a year after they leave.
Unless he was working directly on a KPMG case.........
Why would anyone think this was abnormal ?
Indeed. My CPA is a former IRS auditor. That's why I've worked with him for some 15 years.
Why would anyone think this was abnormal ?
Indeed. My CPA is a former IRS auditor. That's why I've worked with him for some 15 years.
So, you guys don't think that hiring a senior CRA official at the same time that the CRA is investigating the company is at all unusual?
If nothing else, it's politically suspect.
Suspect, yes. Unusual, no. The Cons gutted the CRA, didn't seem interested in collecting taxes. The Libs are talking a good game, but my guess is that's all it will be.
Another reason I was disliking Harper's strategy. Why gut one of the few revenue positive ministries?
Why would anyone think this was abnormal ?
Indeed. My CPA is a former IRS auditor. That's why I've worked with him for some 15 years.
So, you guys don't think that hiring a senior CRA official at the same time that the CRA is investigating the company is at all unusual?
If nothing else, it's politically suspect.
Are you really that naive ?
So many go from the Ministry to private business, and the other way around.
Follow any middle - senior official in government, they all wind up in a business
or pressure groups. The health industry is particularly good at this.
My tax guy; the bottom half of his graduating class are in government Ministries.
They all know each other, all friends.
Can you figure the rest out ?
Indeed. My CPA is a former IRS auditor. That's why I've worked with him for some 15 years.
So, you guys don't think that hiring a senior CRA official at the same time that the CRA is investigating the company is at all unusual?
If nothing else, it's politically suspect.
Are you really that naive ?
So many go from the Ministry to private business, and the other way around.
Follow any middle - senior official in government, they all wind up in a business
or pressure groups. The health industry is particularly good at this.
My tax guy; the bottom half of his graduating class are in government Ministries.
They all know each other, all friends.
Can you figure the rest out ?
Martin, I work in Government. Department of Finance, to be exact. Many other departments in the past. I see public sector hiring good government people all the time. And government does the same to them.
But a company under investigation usually has better sense than to hire one of the people doing the investigation! Can you not see the conflict of interest here?
But a company under investigation usually has better sense than to hire one of the people doing the investigation! Can you not see the conflict of interest here?
I didn't see anything in the article about a current investigation.
Besides, they normally have to wait at least one year... officially.
I didn't see anything in the article about a current investigation.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kpmg-cana ... -1.3526618
Just follow the link.
^^ What he wrote. It was in the 'related articles' section.
You two really expect me to follow all the CBC self linking chest beating ?
Please.
Anyhoo,
Unless he was working directly on a KPMG case.........