CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8157
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:26 am
 


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060331/ap_ ... e_barriers

$1:
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration on Friday cited 62 trading partners for erecting unfair barriers to American exports, with China coming in for criticism in such areas as failure to crack down on copyright piracy.

The survey of the worst trade barriers faced by U.S. companies was included in the "National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers," a report the administration is required to produce annually to highlight areas for special attention by American trade negotiators...



And here's what they have to say about Canada.

PDT_Armataz_01_40


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 19817
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:27 am
 


Did they had themselves???


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 9914
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:44 am
 


What a crock of crap. What a great trading partner they are....... :roll:


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8157
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:34 am
 


QBC QBC:
What a crock of crap. What a great trading partner they are....... :roll:


More like trading combatant.


Offline
Forum Junkie
Forum Junkie
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 755
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:07 pm
 


the US believes in free trade for their goods, not anybody elses...


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:34 pm
 


Robair Robair:
QBC QBC:
What a crock of crap. What a great trading partner they are....... :roll:


More like trading combatant.


"International business is just war by other means."

I forget who said that.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8157
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 1:05 pm
 


eggzaktly.

And our opponent is ten times our size. 8O


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 1:08 pm
 


Robair Robair:
eggzaktly.

And our opponent is ten times our size. 8O


Yeah, but you guys are kicking our ass so don't complain. :?


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8157
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 1:13 pm
 


How do you figure?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Ottawa Senators


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 17037
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:24 pm
 


Typical. America doesn't get her way, so she bawls her eyes out and throws a temper tantrum. :roll:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 11051
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:29 pm
 


Well if you really want them to scream get Texberta to stop selling them oil...untill they settle the softwood dispute....take about 3 days I figure :wink:
Then they would either crack or we would be signing their anthem.


Last edited by fatbasturd on Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Ottawa Senators


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 17037
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:41 pm
 


I think it would be the latter......


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
Profile
Posts: 1571
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:55 pm
 


Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:
Typical. America doesn't get her way, so she bawls her eyes out and throws a temper tantrum. :roll:


and this is unlike what canada does with softwood lumber how?

The US doesn't tax maritime lumber, but it does tax the lumber that the provincial governments essentially gave the logging industries.

The Canadian government has had numerous solutions posed to it where it can either do what canadian governments have done in the past (put their own tarriff on it) it can agree to have the tarriff indexed to maritime lumber (perhaps the most fair) it can sell stumpage rights by auction or it can take the US to Court in a court which actually has enforcement power (US Court of International Trade). However, thats not what the government has done because the politicians find "softwood lumber" to be a better rallying call then to actually fix it.

So both countries just go back and forth to NAFTA and the WTO and only read the bits of the ruling which are favorable to their side, and deride the others for not following those rulings.

I don't like the tarriffs, I don't think the US should bother with them, but the tiresome propaganda that gets bantered around everytime the "trade" and "united states" appears in the same thread is annoying.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 19927
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:19 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Robair Robair:
QBC QBC:
What a crock of crap. What a great trading partner they are....... :roll:


More like trading combatant.


"International business is just war by other means."

I forget who said that.


No one said that. It's a twisting of a famous phrase from Carl von Clausewitz who said "War is nothing but a continuation of politics by other means".


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2928
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:48 pm
 


First, lets remember that most goods coming into the US do so with no trade restrictions or hassle.

Having said that, this is nonsense, and completely ignorant of basic economics.

And trade is not "war". That is also ignorance of economics.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  1  2  3  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.