CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:05 pm
 


Thanos Thanos:
Given the number of patroits psychopaths that are gunning for a US President at any given time, especially nowadays, a full military-grade level of security is completely justified.


Funny how I haven't heard of even one single plot to harm Obama. I'm guessing that America's enemies figure they can't do any better than he is so they're leaving him alone. :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 33561
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 3:08 pm
 


Unfortunately for the Glenn Becks of the world, and their loyal unquestioning drones, Presidential security has been beefed up considerably since the assassination attempt on Ronald Reagan. The only incident of any significant note was when some random Second Amendment Man sprayed the front of the White House with bullets from his semi-auto rifle from the sidewalk during the last couple of years of the Clinton Admin.

But the calls for assassination from the usual suspects keep coming. Here's another Glenn Beck friend, 100% inTEAlecktool and regular FOX guest Michael Scheuer doing what he does best in calling out the troops:

Georgetown Professor Calls For Assassination Of President Obama

$1:
When it comes to gun violence, there's inevitably a lot of finger pointing within the media, trying to place blame for the senseless and callous taking of life at violent images or rhetoric, whether it be movies, video games or music. But let's take a moment to look at how inured the media has become to violent, eliminationist and treasonous rhetoric right there in their own studio/website.

$1:
Lou Dobbs Tonight last night included the sage opinions of a former CIA offical and current Georgetown prof who recently called for the assassination of President Obama. In a 12/23 column on his foreign policy website, Michael Scheuer suggested that history held in high esteem those who have killed tyrants: As they head further down the road of losing wars and wrecking Anglo-American liberties, Messrs Obama and Cameron and their supporters in all parties would do well to read the words of the great 17th century English republican Algernon Sidney, a man who was revered on both sides of the Atlantic, who greatly influenced America’s founders, and who was executed by the British Crown for what it described as sedition. “There must therefore be a right,” Sidney wrote, "of proceeding judicially or extra-judicially against all persons who transgress the laws; or else those laws, and the societies that should subsist by them, cannot stand; and the ends for which governments are constituted, together with the governments themselves, must be overthrown. … If he [a political leader] be justly accounted an enemy of all, who injures all; he above all must be the publick enemy of a nation, who by usurping power over them, does the greatest and most publick injury that a people can suffer. For which reason, by an established law among the most virtuous nations, every man might kill a tyrant; and no names are recorded in history with more honor, than of those who did it. …


The deeming of Obama as a "tyrant" worth assassinating stemmed from Scheuer's assessment of the failures of ....wait for it... Benghazi. That favorite bugaboo of conservative media that has been soundly debunked but still looms large in their fevered brains of their consumers.


Translated into today's language "that damn darkie isn't doing the things I want him to therefore I have a right to shoot him".


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26145
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 3:43 pm
 


Beckophobe, with your beckophobia. You're silly. :wink:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 33561
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:11 pm
 


Speaking of drones, look who's here! How ya doin', Breitbot? :lol:


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:37 pm
 


Thanos Thanos:
The only incident of any significant note was when some random Second Amendment Man sprayed the front of the White House with bullets from his semi-auto rifle from the sidewalk during the last couple of years of the Clinton Admin.


Fail.

There's not even a scintilla of evidence that Francisco Martin Duran fired at the White Hut over gun control. The general gist of things from the case is that he just hated the government for some vague thing that went on during his military career.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 33561
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:41 pm
 


I never said it was over gun control. All I hinted at was that he expressed his Second Amendment right (to threaten, intimidate, and scare the living shit out of others until they complied with his wishes) in a spectacularly public and unforgettable manner. Jeez, try to read more carefully, eh? :roll:


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 5:19 pm
 


Thanos Thanos:
I never said it was over gun control. All I hinted at was that he expressed his Second Amendment right (to threaten, intimidate, and scare the living shit out of others until they complied with his wishes) in a spectacularly public and unforgettable manner. Jeez, try to read more carefully, eh? :roll:


I did.

$1:
The only incident of any significant note was when some random Second Amendment Man sprayed the front of the White House with bullets from his semi-auto rifle from the sidewalk during the last couple of years of the Clinton Admin.


Turns out he was not at all a 'Second Amendment Man'. Thus the Fail.

Nice try at the save, though. [B-o]


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 9445
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 5:51 pm
 


Image
That cute is lucky Harper didn't go JC on his ass. :mrgreen:


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 5:57 pm
 


Hahaha!

Back on topic (kinda) are you folks up yonder getting this "polar vortex" propaganda in your news media? Down here we're hearing this endlessly and it seems like a coordinated message (or at least a viral buzzword) to make a cold snap look like something caused by (GASP!) global warming.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14747
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 6:27 pm
 


BRAH BRAH:
Image
That cute is lucky Harper didn't go JC on his ass. :mrgreen:


ROTFL

He may have been a dipshit as PM but at least he knew how to choke a chicken. [B-o]


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7684
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 6:27 pm
 


BRAH BRAH:
Image
That cute is lucky Harper didn't go JC on his ass. :mrgreen:


The shades he's wearin' just make the image perfect.

"No Jean! NO! *ack gag gurgle*"

:lol:


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2271
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 6:52 pm
 


I always liked how Jean handled security on his watch. He never let anything get to him and if need be took matters into his own hands.

Saw what you want about his politics and trucks full of drugs he was a man when it came to his security detail.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26145
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 6:58 pm
 


Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
BRAH BRAH:
Image
That cute is lucky Harper didn't go JC on his ass. :mrgreen:


ROTFL

He may have been a dipshit as PM but at least he knew how to choke a chicken. [B-o]


OK, now that made me laugh. XD


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26145
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:03 pm
 


You'd almost swear Jean was setting that little sweety-pie up to give him a big wet smooch on the lips though, wouldn't you?

Hey, here's one I didn't know. Did you know that chokehold is called The Shawnigan Handshake?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26145
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:32 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Hahaha!

Back on topic (kinda) are you folks up yonder getting this "polar vortex" propaganda in your news media? Down here we're hearing this endlessly and it seems like a coordinated message (or at least a viral buzzword) to make a cold snap look like something caused by (GASP!) global warming.


You mean, like this?

" On Monday's CBS This Morning, Charlie Rose predictably placed the blame for the unusually cold weather in North America on climate change. Rose wondered, "Is it definitely connected to global warming?"

Rose and co-anchor Norah O'Donnell turned to climate change alarmist Bryan Walsh of Time magazine, who only cited vague "theories...that some of the warming...you're seeing up in the Arctic might be changing the atmospheric circulation in that part of the world...and maybe, makes these cold spells a little more likely than they otherwise be."

[snip]

The former NBC correspondent and the Time editor then revealed that neither one of them had much background knowledge on the phenomenon of the polar vortex:

O'DONNELL: ...This is the first time I've heard the phrase 'polar vortex'....And I don't feel I'm out of it. I mean, were you familiar with it?

WALSH: I was not that familiar with it – no – but now, of course, it's one of those terms that's – that's everywhere, and it really – it does, sort of, explain – you know, if you think what is a hurricane up in the north, and you see that wind spilling down, you can actually see the temperatures falling up in the upper Midwest, all the way down to the south..."


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-ba ... ted-global

But as you know words like 'might be', and 'may be' (as in connected) are the same thing as saying "is connected' in Warmism speak. It's just a way of saying a thing without having to support your supposition with anything inconvenient, like a fact.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Previous  1  2  3  4  5 ... 7  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.