[Tracker]

lily lily:

I see, said the blind man.


What exactly were you referring to when you said, "Guys have their dinkskin cut off when newborns", if not circumsision?

Not female clitoris removal, which is what you wanted this procedure in the article to resemble.

Most have the ability to distinguish between the two. Sorry you can't. Good luck with that.

[Tracker]

lily lily:

Tracker Tracker:

Choban Choban:

The whole thing is strange.
But if someone wants to spend the money then why not?
Personally it doesn't matter to me.

I can see why, that if it looked like two massive half shrivled clams were trying to escape from a persons crotch the cosmedic procedure might have interest.

Which nicely illustrates why my first post was:

$1:

My first thought when I read this was what the hell is the matter with us that we feel we need to alter ourselves to meet some unrealistic ideal?

Yes, and I understood your position when reading your post. Why can't you just understand mine. It was just a post showing my stance that there's nothing to really cry about if this is what people choose to do to themselves. Seems that it should just be accepted if other similar procedures are accepted.

[Tracker]

I understood you, doesn't mean I agree with your position of it being unrealistic. Unnecessary, yes.

But you just wanted to argue because you didn't like how people (guys) could help but compare the procedure in the article to MALE circumsision.

You have your views I have mine.

Have a good day, lily.

[Tracker]

Designer Vaginas. I wonder if they can make them less grumpy.

[Blue_Nose]

Speaking of the posted article

$1:

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists has issued a position statement on the trend, labelling it dangerous, expensive and unwarranted.

$1:

"We feel these operations might prey on people with insecurities and fears who actually need psychological help,'' he said.

As I already pointed out, why are breast implants, liposuction, botox, and facelifts acceptable, but vagina modifications deemed dangerous, expensive and unwarranted, and a sign that the woman has psychological issues?

[Blue_Nose]

OK, so why should one of them be banned and not the rest?

A woman can choose to have any part of her body modified, as many times as she likes, except her vagina? It makes no sense.

[Tracker]

Designer Penis. ok.

Designer Vagina. not ok.

[Fezzaroooo]

Hello..

[Blue_Nose]

Mine's perfect the way it is, anyway.

[Fezzaroooo]

what you guys on about? :s

[Fezzaroooo]

lol hey, how do you get a flag next to your name? :S:S:

[Blue_Nose]

edit your profile.

[ziggy]

Fezzaroooo Fezzaroooo:

what you guys on about? :s

Designer vaginers.

[Fezzaroooo]

ohh right, cheers.

designer vaginers? what the hell is that?

[Fezzaroooo]

thanks pal!.. soo, like you all canadians?