What I find interesting here is people used to tell me if you didn't like what was going to be taught in a particular class you didn't have to let your kids attend.
Turns out that's a lie.
$1:
Board lawyer Mark Zega stated that Tourloukis has a right to public education, but no right to “impose his religious” views by “sending a message somebody else’s lifestyle is not acceptable.”
Leaving the classroom “conveys a message of non-acceptance that can’t be accepted in a public school system where tolerance is a statutory objective,” Zega told the Court.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/wynne ... -charter-cAlso here's Tourloukis giving his side.
$1:
Tourloukis told reporters after the hearing that he was “a little bit disappointed in how things were presented in the court.”
“I don’t mind my children being exposed to factual information,” he emphasized. “I’m not advocating for ignorance and I’m not trying to censor other children.”
Added Tourloukis: “I only objected to them teaching their subjective opinion to my children on certain topics.”
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/wynne ... -charter-cThe 'subjective opinion of certain topics' he's talking about has nothing to do with the science of evolution.
He believes the school is pushing a subjective preference for a lifestyle of homosexuality and same sex marriage. He wants to be told if that's the lesson.
It seems to me the solution would be simple. If that is not the intent of a lesson just agree to tell him in advance. If it never happens, no problem. If they are pushing subjective lifestyle choices though, he's right. He should be told and be allowed to pull his kids from class.