|
Author |
Topic Options
|
Posts: 7710
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:26 pm
DerbyX DerbyX: I don't need to since you can't establish them being socialist besides your own idiocy. electing federal CPC MPs crinks those thoughts.
On Yer ... wait for it ... Bike. Bull Shit. The only reason Saskatchewanites moved away from the NDP is they are hoping to be more like Alberta. I would conceed that Alberta is a die hard Conservative strong hold. Regardless of what they voted federally... it's again all in the percentage of votes as the Liberal and NDP split the vote. Saskatchewan Party is not Socialist but is moving left as time goes. http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedi ... ewan-Party Canada is always 5 years behind the USA, so watch the elections in the USA. Bet ya if Obama wins, the Liberals will get a majority in Canada in the next election.
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:31 pm
tritium tritium: Canada is always 5 years behind the USA, so watch the elections in the USA. Bet ya if Obama wins, the Liberals will get a majority in Canada in the next election. ![huh? [huh]](./images/smilies/icon_scratch.gif) You don't have much faith in the intelligence or integrity of the Canadian public do you???????
|
Posts: 12398
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:33 pm
DerbyX DerbyX: PluggyRug PluggyRug: DerbyX DerbyX: Admitting it is the first step. The next is admitting there is a higher power, the Liberals.  Not until the Libs get a Zero Point Module. If they do, even I will vote for them. Now whats the thread about.....Oh yes the werewolf in the closet..err...howl or sumptin. Zed-P-M. You scifi geek you! Speaking of werewolves. American werewolf in London was on today. What was it? East proctor? Loads of sheep. Make you homesick?  No homesick here....Londons full of weirdwolves, the sheep are frightened. I thought I'd solved the ZPM problem but it burped, farted and put out 1 mW of energy. I was going to take it back to the drawing board until, being the red neck that I am, I realised it was destined for the woodstove.
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:33 pm
tritium tritium: DerbyX DerbyX: I don't need to since you can't establish them being socialist besides your own idiocy. electing federal CPC MPs crinks those thoughts.
On Yer ... wait for it ... Bike. Bull Shit. The only reason Saskatchewanites moved away from the NDP is they are hoping to be more like Alberta. I would conceed that Alberta is a die hard Conservative strong hold. Regardless of what they voted federally... it's again all in the percentage of votes as the Liberal and NDP split the vote. Saskatchewan Party is not Socialist but is moving left as time goes. http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedi ... ewan-Party Canada is always 5 years behind the USA, so watch the elections in the USA. Bet ya if Obama wins, the Liberals will get a majority in Canada in the next election. Read you own words. Its going to be legend.. wait for it .. dary Off you go now sunshine! 
|
Posts: 7710
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:37 pm
DerbyX DerbyX: Read you own words. Its going to be legend.. wait for it .. dary Off you go now sunshine!  You really are a moron. 
|
Posts: 7710
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:38 pm
Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy: tritium tritium: Canada is always 5 years behind the USA, so watch the elections in the USA. Bet ya if Obama wins, the Liberals will get a majority in Canada in the next election. ![huh? [huh]](./images/smilies/icon_scratch.gif) You don't have much faith in the intelligence or integrity of the Canadian public do you??????? Honestly, I do. That is why they will vote Liberal next time around... (with NDP as the official opposition)  ...but still prefer Mccain/Palin south of the border. Obama will gut the military. Obama is a smart man, no doubt... but he will weaken the USA.
Last edited by tritium on Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:40 pm
tritium tritium: Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy: tritium tritium: Canada is always 5 years behind the USA, so watch the elections in the USA. Bet ya if Obama wins, the Liberals will get a majority in Canada in the next election. ![huh? [huh]](./images/smilies/icon_scratch.gif) You don't have much faith in the intelligence or integrity of the Canadian public do you??????? Honestly, I do. That is why they will vote Liberal next time around... (with NDP as the official opposition)  I wait with bated breath. 
|
Posts: 7684
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:36 am
tritium tritium: ...but still prefer Mccain/Palin south of the border. Obama will gut the military. Obama is a smart man, no doubt... but he will weaken the USA. What do you think the "left" will do to the Canadian military? Or don't you care?
|
Posts: 21665
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:24 am
Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy: DerbyX DerbyX: Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy: Until I read this thread I had no idea who Heather Mallick was........ and now:
I STILL DON'T GIVE A FUCK WHO SHE IS Where have you been? She is Stephen Harpers mistress! Surely you jest. And here I thought it was his clairvoiyant hairdresser. Nothing personal, but, I wouldn't do her with your gear.  That was completely inappropriate and sexist. And funny too.
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 2:59 pm
Here's a thing that bugs me about oh so many lefties...
"we'd really rather not have a prime minister who, when confronted with his own small child at his school, reaches down and shakes the child's hand. We'd like a human being in charge."
Where the Hell are you getting We from Heather Malick from? You got bugs?
You know what I mean though, right? With lefties it's always, "Canadians say, Canadians believe, Canadians know". I'm Canadian. I don't know, think, or believe anything like what you're spouting. Don't presume to speak for me, because you're just going to piss me off, and I'm going to find it easier to check the ballot box that's going to bug you the most.
|
Posts: 21665
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:08 pm
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog: Here's a thing that bugs me about oh so many lefties...
"we'd really rather not have a prime minister who, when confronted with his own small child at his school, reaches down and shakes the child's hand. We'd like a human being in charge."
Where the Hell are you getting We from Heather Malick from? You got bugs?
You know what I mean though, right? With lefties it's always, "Canadians say, Canadians believe, Canadians know". I'm Canadian. I don't know, think, or believe anything like what you're spouting. Don't presume to speak for me, because you're just going to piss me off, and I'm going to find it easier to check the ballot box that's going to bug you the most. Maragret Wente, in the Globe and Mail (a right-leaning centrist, I'd say; defineitely not a lefty) does this all the time too. Actually, it's quite widely used. It's an artisitic conceit, a writer's trick, a rhetorical tool. It's called "the editorial we" or nosism.
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:33 pm
What's it called when they believe it, contrary to all obvious evidence? Does that have a name? I'll give it one. Leftist nosism.
|
Posts: 2375
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:40 pm
Tritium...
Saskatchewan has a Majority Saskatchewan Party Gov't. The Saskatchewan Party is a coalition of former Saskatchewan Progressive Conservatives and Saskatchewan Liberals uniting to take down the Saskatchewan NDP. The Saskatchewan Party is generally Centre-Right, but tries to stay in the centre to keep the Liberal members of the party content (and thus keep the NDP out of power).
Federal Saskatchewan has elected 13/14 Conservative MPs. It's a centre-right province at this point in time. But Saskatchewan people have this odd patriotism to their crown corps.
|
StuntmanMike
Active Member
Posts: 355
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:25 am
Zipperfish Zipperfish: Maragret Wente, in the Globe and Mail (a right-leaning centrist, I'd say; defineitely not a lefty) does this all the time too. Actually, it's quite widely used. It's an artisitic conceit, a writer's trick, a rhetorical tool. It's called "the editorial we" or nosism.
Good to see someone around here has actually read something in their lives and can put Heather Mallick in context. I don't know why right wingers let Mallick upset them, because that's exactly what she's trying to do. Mallick is the left's version of Mark Steyn, although not nearly as bright or talented. She goes out of her way to be acerbic and provocative, hoping to initiate a response in those from the other side of the political spectrum.
|
HyperionTheEvil
Forum Super Elite
Posts: 2218
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 7:04 am
StuntmanMike StuntmanMike: Zipperfish Zipperfish: Maragret Wente, in the Globe and Mail (a right-leaning centrist, I'd say; defineitely not a lefty) does this all the time too. Actually, it's quite widely used. It's an artisitic conceit, a writer's trick, a rhetorical tool. It's called "the editorial we" or nosism.
Good to see someone around here has actually read something in their lives and can put Heather Mallick in context. I don't know why right wingers let Mallick upset them, because that's exactly what she's trying to do. Mallick is the left's version of Mark Steyn, although not nearly as bright or talented. She goes out of her way to be acerbic and provocative, hoping to initiate a response in those from the other side of the political spectrum. So how does comparing someones daughter to a porn-star raise politcal awareness? I'd like to know because when the CBC ombudsman asked Mallick these same questions she either couldn't or wouldn't answer.
|
|
Page 4 of 5
|
[ 74 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 116 guests |
|
|