ridenrain ridenrain:
So far we have only one report with no proof that Hillier is angry with Harper, and 2 reports of the opposite. You can't provide any proof and if forced, you'll cry that he can't because of "political interference"..
Who's the one making things up again?
Again, you chase after my examples because you're lost on this one, and I'm going to resist following you because that's just a distraction. Better to follow those failures in their own threads than make every thread a mile wide and an inch deep.
Yet what happened when it was Chretien and Martin denying responsibility in things like adscam. Even when Gomery cleared them you didn't believe it.
You have a long history of calling the Liberals liars and simply dismissing all proof of their innocence as media bias protecting them or false reports.
You got no credibility on this and you know it.
Of course Harper and Hillier denied it. They don't want any cracks to appear.
OJ denied it too. Clinton denied "sexual relations" with Monica also.
Deny, deny, deny. You know all about that don't you.
