CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options



PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:39 pm
 


martin14 martin14:
Curtman Curtman:

I'm getting a fancy sig too..



without question, the only thing in your posts worth looking at. R=UP


Yeah, look over here.. A shiny bead.

Image

Enjoy.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 33561
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:30 am
 


+5 for a great sig GIF. Kitteh haz mad skillz! 8)


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 10666
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 6:33 am
 


Curtman Curtman:

62% of Conservatives in Canada support legalization or decriminalization. Who was asking them for mandatory minimums for non-violent drug offences?



Do Canadians support mass production of weed?

Do Canadians support gang activity relating to the sale of weed?

The laws you keep referring to deal with the production and distribution of the drug along with gang activity. Canadians and Conservatives don't support either.

This false notion you keep presenting is that Harper wants to throw everyone with a dime bag in jail which is complete garbage and you know it.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 3164
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:55 pm
 


Legalize it, gangs market is gone, problem solved, billion upon billions saved.





PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 5:07 pm
 


shockedcanadian shockedcanadian:
Legalize it, gangs market is gone, problem solved, billion upon billions saved.



R=UP

Its not worth discussing with OTI, he still pretending that prohibition doesn't cause gangsterism, and he's still pretending that more enforcement means less drug use instead of more. He hasn't come up with a new argument or explanation of his position in several years.


Senate panel clears the air on marijuana laws
$1:
Federal laws pose "significant obstacles" to regulation of marijuana in states where it is legal and need to be addressed, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said Tuesday in a first-ever hearing aimed at reconciling rapidly changing state marijuana laws with a federal prohibition on the drug.

"We must have a smarter approach to marijuana policy," Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said. "The absolute criminalization of personal marijuana use has contributed to our nation's soaring prison population and has disproportionately affected people of color."

The hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee follows a Justice Department memo outlining how it will enforce federal marijuana prohibitions in two states, Colorado and Washington, that have legalized its use, and 20 states that allow marijuana for medical use.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said he was concerned state regulations would fail to keep marijuana use in check. Colorado, which had legalized marijuana for medical use before legalizing it for recreational use in November, has done a poor job so far of preventing marijuana exports to other states where marijuana remains illegal, he said.

"Why has the Justice Department decided to trust Colorado?" Grassley said. "Colorado has become a significant exporter of marijuana."

The Justice Department reserved its right to challenge state laws if public health or safety problems emerge or if the states fail to enact strict regulations to control marijuana use and sale, Deputy Attorney General James Cole, author of the memo, told the Senate panel.

The states' regulations must be "tough in practice, not just on paper," Cole said. "It must include strong enforcement efforts, backed by adequate funding."

Colorado adopted its final rules on Monday, said Jack Finlaw, chief legal counsel to Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper. He said the 141 pagers of rules cover application and licensing for retail stores; cultivation and manufacturing; testing requirements; inventory tracking; testing and product safety; labeling; and advertising. He said the state would also take steps to limit production so marijuana won't be diverted to other states.

The Justice Department said in its Aug. 29 memo to U.S. attorneys nationwide that it would seek to prosecute people who sell marijuana to minors, use state laws as a cover for drug trafficking or who attempt to distribute marijuana in states where it is not legal.

King County, Wash., Sheriff John Urquhart said he sees little conflict between his state's marijuana laws and federal law enforcement.

"The reality is we do have complimentary goals and values," Urquhart said. "We all agree we don't want our children using marijuana. We all agree we don't want impaired drivers. We all agree we don't want to continue enriching criminals."





PostPosted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:44 pm
 


Patrick Leahy taps Rand Paul to fight drug sentences
$1:
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) is bringing some conservative star power to a hearing next week on mandatory drug minimums: Rand Paul.

The Kentucky GOP senator will serve as the top witness during a panel hearing on reevaluating the effectiveness of mandatory guidelines used in courts to sentence drug offenders. The political odd couple has also drafted a bill together intended to give judges more flexibility on some drug cases.

Mandatory minimums are costly, unjust and do not make our country safer,” Leahy said in a statement, “The states are leading the way in reversing this wrong-headed approach to law enforcement, and it is time for the federal government to follow that example.

The hearing will take place at 10 a.m. on Wednesday.


R=UP


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2271
PostPosted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 3:23 pm
 


Thanos Thanos:
Senator McCain should start smoking it and maybe he'll lose that overwhelming desire he's got to have wars everywhere all the time.


Hells yes. Idea of the week right there.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Previous  1  2



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.