[2Cdo]

Macguyver Macguyver:

Solid Majority? It does take about a grade 4 to know that 60% of the votes cast were NOT for the CPC party,

About the same percentage who didn't vote for Chreteins Liberals but that was okay with you.

The rest of your post was pure pablum.

[CDN_PATRIOT]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Macguyver Macguyver:

Solid Majority? It does take about a grade 4 to know that 60% of the votes cast were NOT for the CPC party,

About the same percentage who didn't vote for Chreteins Liberals but that was okay with you.

The rest of your post was pure pablum.

-J.

[Macguyver]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Macguyver Macguyver:

Solid Majority? It does take about a grade 4 to know that 60% of the votes cast were NOT for the CPC party,

About the same percentage who didn't vote for Chreteins Liberals but that was okay with you.

The rest of your post was pure pablum.

No it wasn't. I'm not a big fan. I voted Liberal twice only because the candidates were personal friends of mine, one being Chris Axworthy, and we were startegic voting in Saskatoon to get Maurice out. Lol Maurice, there is another charming "family values" man.

[Gunnair]

Macguyver Macguyver:

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Macguyver Macguyver:

Solid Majority? It does take about a grade 4 to know that 60% of the votes cast were NOT for the CPC party,

About the same percentage who didn't vote for Chreteins Liberals but that was okay with you.

The rest of your post was pure pablum.

No it wasn't. I'm not a big fan. I voted Liberal twice only because the candidates were personal friends of mine, one being Chris Axworthy, and we were startegic voting in Saskatoon to get Maurice out. Lol Maurice, there is another charming "family values" man.

What is 'startegic' voting, grammar cop?

[ShepherdsDog]

Macguyver Macguyver:

CDN_PATRIOT CDN_PATRIOT:

Macguyver Macguyver:

Well, those of you intelligent voters who placed a ballot, you either stand with me, a wannabe Leftard that's been rejected by everyone except the Marxist Leninist Party, or you stand with the government you gave a solid majority through democratic elections. Which will it be?

Fixed for accuracy

-J.

Solid Majority? It only does takes about a Grade 4 student to know that 60% of the votes cast were NOT for the CPC party, so I don't expect anyone who voted for them to know that. There have been studies, that I agree with, saying you folks are not so too bright. Apparently there is muchsome truth to that. Carry on peon.

snicker...this post reads like it was written by someone who struggled in Grade 4.

[Macguyver]

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

snicker...this post reads like it was written by someone who struggled in Grade 4.

I get it, if you didn’t make it through elementary school you might have trouble reading that post and feel the need to correct it. I appreciate you highlighting your stupidity by trying to correct a grammatically correct paragraph. Well, except for the fragment in the first sentence which somehow you neglected to see.

I feel like I’m wallowing in retards every time I come to this site. You guys are pretty easy to spot though, most of the time, because for the “C” beside each of your names, so thanks for that. It really blows my mind that some of you have 10,000 posts but have yet to say anything important. Seems like such a waste of time. But hey, chances are when you’re that dense you probably are not doing much but flicking boogers and sitting around in your pissy smelling trailers.

[Macguyver]

Gunnair Gunnair:

No it wasn't. I'm not a big fan. I voted Liberal twice only because the candidates were personal friends of mine, one being Chris Axworthy, and we were startegic voting in Saskatoon to get Maurice out. Lol Maurice, there is another charming "family values" man.

$1:

What is 'startegic' voting, grammar cop?

Maybe you should get a subscription to the internet and find out the difference between "grammar" and "spelling". Idiot.

[Gunnair]

Macguyver Macguyver:

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

snicker...this post reads like it was written by someone who struggled in Grade 4.

Maybe you`ll also learn the quote function, retard.

[Macguyver]

EDIT BY MOD

[Gunnair]

Pics from your personal collection. Brilliant!

[Macguyver]

EDIT BY MOD

[Regina]

Lets get this back on topic without the colour and no one will get a vacation.

[Curtman]

Toews surprised by content of online surveillance bill

$1:

Public Safety Minister Vic Toews says he is surprised to learn that a section of the government's online surveillance bill provides for "exceptional circumstances" under which "any police officer" can request customer information from a telecommunications service provider.

I see they've ramped up the backpeddling to full steam now.



Next up, the horrible copyright bill that is no good for anyone in the tech industry. Only Hollywood benefits, not even the artists.

[sandorski]

Curtman Curtman:

Toews surprised by content of online surveillance bill

$1:

Public Safety Minister Vic Toews says he is surprised to learn that a section of the government's online surveillance bill provides for "exceptional circumstances" under which "any police officer" can request customer information from a telecommunications service provider.

I see they've ramped up the backpeddling to full steam now.



Next up, the horrible copyright bill that is no good for anyone in the tech industry. Only Hollywood benefits, not even the artists.

Hmm, makes me wonder who wrote it.

[bootlegga]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Macguyver Macguyver:

Solid Majority? It does take about a grade 4 to know that 60% of the votes cast were NOT for the CPC party,

About the same percentage who didn't vote for Chreteins Liberals but that was okay with you.

The rest of your post was pure pablum.

How would you know? I mean really, how could you know that?

Macguyver joined the forum last year, and last I checked, Chretien had been out of federal politics for almost a decade (he left politics in late 2003). The only way you could possibly know for sure is if you actually knew MacGuyver in real life and he actually told you - which I doubt.

This isn't me coming to the defence of a forum troublemaker (as MacGuyver most assuredly is), but rather me pointing out that many Conservative supporters here are quick to say, "well you never complained about Chretien's meagre majorities" despite the fact that none of you has any real proof, because most regulars (left or right) on this site joined AFTER Chretien left politics. But hey, don't let the truth or facts get in your way.

I'd say both of you had lots of pablum in your posts.