Are you talking about the border jumpers? If so, there's this:
$1:
The Safe Third Country Agreement is an agreement between the governments of Canada and the United States to better manage the flow of refugee claimants at the shared land border.
Under the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement, persons seeking refugee protection must make a claim in the first country they arrive in (United States or Canada), unless they qualify for an exception to the Agreement. Therefore, refugee claimants arriving from the United States at the Canada-United States land border may be allowed to pursue their refugee claims in Canada if they meet an exception under the Safe Third Country Agreement.
The Safe Third Country Agreement does not apply to U.S. citizens or to habitual residents of the United States who are not citizens of any country
But if you go to the exceptions section of that government website you come to this.
$1:
A refugee claimant will not be eligible to have his/her claim referred to the IRB if:
the claimant had arrived in Canada directly from a designated safe third country
Therefore it would seem he would be disqualified and the following would come into effect sending him back directly from the border crossing.
$1:
If the border services officer has determined that a refugee claimant is not eligible to make a refugee claim in Canada, his/her claim will not be referred to the IRB and he/she will be issued a removal order and immediately returned back to the United States.
http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/agency-agenc ... protectionSo it sounds like if you go to the America/Canada border and claim refugee status you'll get sent back, but apparently you can get past that by border jumping illegally because...I don't know why...
But sounds illegal to me, so yeah, I'm calling
"illegal immigrant" too. Something's illegal there or who needs border crossings? Why wouldn't everybody jump the border if it's not illegal? Brah sounds correct when he says "illegal immigrant". Personally I would have said immigrant invader.