|
Author |
Topic Options
|
Posts: 15102
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:48 pm
Tricks Tricks: lily lily: $1: Tricks it's obvious the conservatives will take the high road again.
Apparently the high road detours around taking Bart to task for what he said. Apparantly it is ok to not say anything about all the things the liberals have done though right? Cause if a con does it, then its bad, but if a liberal does it, it is ok. Great logic  You hit the nail on the head. Funny you can understand that, as young as you are but your elders can't.
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:50 pm
RUEZ RUEZ: Tricks Tricks: lily lily: $1: Tricks it's obvious the conservatives will take the high road again.
Apparently the high road detours around taking Bart to task for what he said. Apparantly it is ok to not say anything about all the things the liberals have done though right? Cause if a con does it, then its bad, but if a liberal does it, it is ok. Great logic  You hit the nail on the head. Funny you can understand that, as young as you are but your elders can't. You see, I am young so my logic is wrong 
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:52 pm
lily lily: Read it again.
He's suggesting that Ukrainian Canadians could easily have ties to the Nazis.
Hey, Ziggy... how do you feel about that?
It's probably true,my last name is german after all.
I also drew lots of swastika's in school(doodling) and allmost got a tatoo of one.
I sure aint no skinhead though. 
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:56 pm
lily lily: $1: You have the halarious medal, where is your sense of humor?
I have 2. Bart has none. Think on that one. This topic has been very informative. A Lib accuses a political group of defacing a rival's signs, and that's apparently a really bad thing. A Con excuses it, saying the guy is of Ukrainian heritage, so there's likely some truth to it... and that's humour. You guys need to take a deep breath and go back and reread some of these posts... preferably without your right-wing blinders on. The issue here is defacing signs with swastikas. Why was it not ok for RUS to speculate who was responsible, but okay for Bart to speculate the reasons why? And why are you bringing in all sorts of other issues to cloud this one... like the knitting comment? I'm noticing a trend here. Wow, your such a hypocrit. You tell us to go back without our "blinders" yet you need to do the same. Bart was making a comparison to Rus saying it was conservatives. I will fucking PM him and ask him right now what he meant.
|
Posts: 65472
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:57 pm
VitaminC VitaminC: That guy just said that since the guy was ukrainian, he probably is a nazi, and thus it is not a hate crime....
Hey, fuckwit, where in my post does it say "probably"? And where did I say he was a Nazi? You dumfuck, the guy was born long after the Nazi Party collectively departed this earth.
It *may* be guilt by association and I did not say that it was right. And if his father or grandfather served in the Wehrmacht or the SS, which is statistically probable given the history of the Ukraine, then would you consider that a hate crime?
None of you liberal hypocrites have a problem with conservative Arnold Schwarzennegger getting constantly labeled a Nazi because his father was a Nazi - or do you consider that a hate crime, too?
Or is it just a hate crime only when YOUR people get called Nazis?
|
Posts: 65472
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:58 pm
lily lily: Read it again.
He's suggesting that Ukrainian Canadians could easily have ties to the Nazis.
Hey, Ziggy... how do you feel about that?
Good Christ Almighty, lily, I expect better of you than this.
|
Posts: 15102
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:58 pm
lily lily: I'm noticing a trend here. Yes there is quite a trend here, you ignore what the liberals here do and like to pick at anything else.
|
VitaminC
Forum Super Elite
Posts: 2031
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:59 pm
RUEZ RUEZ: lily lily: Read it again, RUEZ, and think about what I said.
Does what Bart said bother you? Apparently not, according to your response. This isn't about what Bart said, forget about that. This is about some jackass actually lieing about something, and it doesn't bother you one iota. But you were bothered about a remark about knitting. You can't even hide your bias anymore.
Knitting? WTF are you talking about.....what planet do you live on???
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:00 pm
Ignore my PM bart lol. Ok so I was wrong, but Bart has explained himself quite well.
|
Posts: 65472
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:01 pm
VitaminC VitaminC: Tricks Tricks: lily lily: Read it again.
He's suggesting that Ukrainian Canadians could easily have ties to the Nazis.
Hey, Ziggy... how do you feel about that? They COULD have. trying to point out another situation. Or he is trying to show how rediculous saying the cons did it is. No, he is defending the person who painted the sign. I don't think that it was a member of the Conservative party who did it, but BartSimpson does, and he is defending them.... In fact, maybe it was BartSimpson who did, maybe we should notify the authorities.

Last edited by BartSimpson on Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:01 pm
lily lily: ziggy ziggy: lily lily: Read it again.
He's suggesting that Ukrainian Canadians could easily have ties to the Nazis.
Hey, Ziggy... how do you feel about that? It's probably true,my last name is german after all. I also drew lots of swastika's in school(doodling) and allmost got a tatoo of one. I sure aint no skinhead though.  All right then. I apologize to Bart. Apparently he had a point after all. And your last name is not German. Want to bet on that? It was spelled with a "Z" at one time. People changed the spelling of their names often back then maybe to not be associated with the nazi's,I dont know but my name came from a mercenary relative and in German it translated into the phrase "TO VICTORY"! The spelling changed many times over the years.
|
VitaminC
Forum Super Elite
Posts: 2031
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:02 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson: VitaminC VitaminC: That guy just said that since the guy was ukrainian, he probably is a nazi, and thus it is not a hate crime....
Hey, fuckwit, where in my post does it say "probably"? And where did I say he was a Nazi? You dumfuck, the guy was born long after the Nazi Party collectively departed this earth. It *may* be guilt by association and I did not say that it was right. And if his father or grandfather served in the Wehrmacht or the SS, which is statistically probable given the history of the Ukraine, then would you consider that a hate crime? None of you liberal hypocrites have a problem with conservative Arnold Schwarzennegger getting constantly labeled a Nazi because his father was a Nazi - or do you consider that a hate crime, too? Or is it just a hate crime only when YOUR people get called Nazis?
You are defending whether or not painting a swastika on someone's property is a hate crime.....what the hell does their ethnic background have to do with it?
And I re-iterate: People do not paint Swastika's on Nazi's houses. Nazis paint Swastikas on the houses of people they hate.
Anytime someone paints a swastika on anything, it IS a hate crime, got it?
|
Posts: 15102
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:03 pm
VitaminC VitaminC: RUEZ RUEZ: lily lily: Read it again, RUEZ, and think about what I said.
Does what Bart said bother you? Apparently not, according to your response. This isn't about what Bart said, forget about that. This is about some jackass actually lieing about something, and it doesn't bother you one iota. But you were bothered about a remark about knitting. You can't even hide your bias anymore. Knitting? WTF are you talking about.....what planet do you live on??? Seriously if you can't keep up then go sit in the corner with your dunce cap on.
|
VitaminC
Forum Super Elite
Posts: 2031
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:04 pm
If someone paints a Swastika on Joe Blow's house, they are not saying that Joe Blow is a Nazi. They are saying that they are Nazis, and that Nazis hate Joe Blow.......
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:05 pm
VitaminC VitaminC: BartSimpson BartSimpson: VitaminC VitaminC: That guy just said that since the guy was ukrainian, he probably is a nazi, and thus it is not a hate crime....
Hey, fuckwit, where in my post does it say "probably"? And where did I say he was a Nazi? You dumfuck, the guy was born long after the Nazi Party collectively departed this earth. It *may* be guilt by association and I did not say that it was right. And if his father or grandfather served in the Wehrmacht or the SS, which is statistically probable given the history of the Ukraine, then would you consider that a hate crime? None of you liberal hypocrites have a problem with conservative Arnold Schwarzennegger getting constantly labeled a Nazi because his father was a Nazi - or do you consider that a hate crime, too? Or is it just a hate crime only when YOUR people get called Nazis? You are defending whether or not painting a swastika on someone's property is a hate crime.....what the hell does their ethnic background have to do with it? And I re-iterate: People do not paint Swastika's on Nazi's houses. Nazis paint Swastikas on the houses of people they hate. Anytime someone paints a swastika on anything, it IS a hate crime, got it? So reprimend Rus for thinking cons did it. Why not yell at those people who called ahnold a nazi? Because they are liberal, and you can't turn your back on a fellow hypocrit
|
|
Page 7 of 11
|
[ 160 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests |
|
|