lily lily:
Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206:
lily lily:
The point that should be standing -
~95% of the jobs created last month were part-time jobs... and we're supposed to be thrilled with this supposed proof that the economy is booming?
Last time I checked, creating jobs helped the economy. Part time jobs included. Also this was just a month, next month = more jobs. Maybe even full time jobs? Either way, it shows the jobs are increasing and not decreasing which is a good thing.
This isn't a case of "part time jobs included"... it's more the other way around.
As Brenda said, a part-time job is good for a second income, but it's nothing youcan live on. You don't make enough money and you're not eligible for benefits or stat holidays. And as someone else said - sometimes it means you're ineligible for EI retraining programs.
Right, so you would prefer to have a straight job lose rather then that additional income as a option? Because as far as I am concerned, part time is still a income and contributes to the economy and not all those jobs were part time just a majority of the percent.
If I got laid off, I would love to atleast work at TimHortons part time rather than sit on my ass all day watching TV and atleast contributing a income for something. Because most people who get laid off do not bounce back right away, infact for some it takes thems over a year to find a new job depending on what field they are trying to apply for. Those people can really use a part time job to contribute while they are job hunting.
So maybe to you with you having a job that pays the bills already, a part time job increase would seem like nothing but you can't say the same for those who don't have a current steady income coming in and have bills and rent to pay.