[McRobert]

Mr. Harper....

A) Snap election call leading into US financial crisis/During US elections
-This seemed like a panic style call, rushed

B) Canadian debate on same night as US debate
-Probably will be less viewers

C) Canadian economy is going to get rammed when the US goes down
-"Our economy is -FUNDAMENTALLY- strong" yeah presently

D) Lynch says Canada will fall into similar crisis with the US
-Merril Lynch knows!

E) CIBC 10bil outstanding in bs mortgages alone
-President fired

F) Canadian banks in to the tune of 31billion overall (mortgages)
-Easy money baby!

G) 140 Billion in "protected investments"
-Wonder where they invested all that money EH!

H) Manufacturing sector starting to report severe decline (duh)
-We gots lots of oil man! uhhh

I) SPP talks increasing (NAU?)
-Maybe it wont be such a bad thing comrades

Canadians complain about how "stupid" the Americans are but the fact of the matter is generally we are just as dumb. In some ways we are actually worse even. So anyways after writing this I can only say... Harper's pretty smart for doing what he is doing and you the people sure as hell aint.

[Public_Domain]

[martin14]

McRobert, if you want to have any credibility around here,
first thing is you have to learn how to spell.
Your grammar could use a little work as well.

[McRobert]

Its all about the message, I have no time to play author, editor, teacher, philosopher etc.. I research, I write, you read, hopefully investigate my claims and come to your own conclusions.

Oh btw, and no offense of course..How does ones grammar or ability to spell determine the credibility of a person or the content put forth? -Rhetorical-


"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance" -Einstein

[Public_Domain]

[martin14]

hmmm, can't read either, I haven't made any comment about your first
post regarding content.

If you have to ask about grammar or spelling affecting credibility,
then i am afraid you are beyond hope.

How can people expect to take you seriously when you have no command of
English language ?

[Reverend Blair]

"It's a poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word." Mark Twain or Ben Franklin or somebody. And I likely screwed up the wording too. The guy had a point though.

And so does McRobert. Harper slammed us into this election because if it would have been a month later, he'd be facing the wrath of a lot of people. He broke his own law because if he would have waited, he would have gotten his ass kicked. He might yet...two weeks is a long time.

[ridenrain]

"robert" is simply another new member who signed on for the election.
He's as topical or as credible as the daily smear job from the CBC or the tax dodging Rev. here.

[Reverend Blair]

I pay my taxes, Riden. And you seem pretty paranoid about new members. Why don't you want new people here?

[Regina]

McRobert McRobert:

Oh btw, and no offense of course..How does ones grammar or ability to spell determine the credibility of a person or the content put forth? -Rhetorical-

It show the level of intellect or lack of which the reader will take into consideration when he's deciding if it’s worth a read.

[Tricks]

Regina Regina:

McRobert McRobert:

Oh btw, and no offense of course..How does ones grammar or ability to spell determine the credibility of a person or the content put forth? -Rhetorical-

It show the level of intellect or lack of which the reader will take into consideration when he deciding if it’s worth a read.

That... and he used the wrong "to" in the thread title. That's pretty much the only reason I clicked on this, so I could laugh at them. So...

[Pseudonym]

Regina Regina:

It show

Regina Regina:

It show

Regina Regina:

It show

OMG BAD GRAMMER!!!1 0_0

[ridenrain]

Oh, Come on. Give poor Garth Turner here a break. He's probably typing that out on his phone because elections Canada took his computer away as evidence for their fraud investigation.

[Regina]

Pseudonym Pseudonym:

Regina Regina:

It show

Regina Regina:

It show

Regina Regina:

It show

OMG BAD GRAMMER!!!1 0_0

I'm blaming my laptop and bad eyes.

[Regina]

lily lily:

Regina Regina:

McRobert McRobert:

Oh btw, and no offense of course..How does ones grammar or ability to spell determine the credibility of a person or the content put forth? -Rhetorical-

It show the level of intellect or lack of which the reader will take into consideration when he's deciding if it’s worth a read.

Really?

Unless the post is indecipherable, I look at the content, not the presentation.

The purpose of language it to convey thought. If you can do that, you've succeeded. It doesn't matter how pretty it is.

Yeah....that's not what I look for but I read these forums with a different view.