CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1530
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:37 pm
 


Go to this site to sign an online petition that directs your message to the US government, media, and congress.

http://stopwaroniran.org/

Stop the war on Iran before it starts!


It is with grave concern that we observe the growing threat of a new U.S. war--this time against the people of Iran.

The media is filled with reports of an alleged nuclear threat posed by Iran and the assumed need for the U.S. to take military action. These reports recall the "Weapons of Mass Destruction" stories issued in the months leading up to the war on Iraq.

In the lead up to the illegal invasion of Iraq, the Bush Administration asserted that Iraq possessed massive stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction and that it was capable of launching an attack - nuclear, chemical and biological - on the U.S. within 45 minutes.

President Bush said that the U.S. had to attack immediately, and could not "wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud." We all know now that this propaganda campaign was a complete fabrication created to justify a war of aggression.

Now we see reports that are all too similar being made to justify military action against the people of Iran. Taking Iran to the UN Security Council is a prelude for unilateral action. Just as in the case of Iraq, none of the claims made by the U.S. government stand up to unbiased scrutiny. Iran has submitted to the most intrusive and humiliating inspections, above and beyond what is required by Nuclear Weapons Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). None of the inspections have found any evidence that Iran is developing a nuclear weapons program.

There is only one government that has used nuclear weapons against civilian populations, and that same country has the largest stockpile of weapons of mass destruction on the planet. Most dangerous and incredible it is at this very moment developing a new generation of tactical nuclear weapons that it intends to use, not merely to threaten. That country is, of course, the United States. Shouldn't any real discussion of the dangers of nuclear weapons include the weapons stockpiled by the Pentagon and the history of U.S. aggression and interventions?

Iran has suffered greatly at the hands of the U.S. We recall the U.S. overthrew the democratically elected government of Dr. M. Mossadegh and returned the Shah to the Peacock Throne – ‘the proudest achievement of the CIA’. For 25 years the Shah ruled Iran with an iron fist for the benefit of U.S. oil corporations before the people of Iran, in the millions, overthrew his tyranny at a terrible cost in lives. For the past 27 years U.S. sanctions have impeded Iran’s right to development and brought great suffering to the people.

It is essential that all voices opposed to the devastation of a new war in the Middle East speak out now. We urge an immediate end to Washington's campaign of sanctions, hostility, and falsehood against the people of Iran. We oppose any new U.S. aggression against Iran. We need funds for human needs, not endless war for empire.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25516
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:57 pm
 


Calgary123 Calgary123:
There is only one government that has used nuclear weapons against civilian populations
Why do people want to use this as a negative?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25516
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:03 pm
 


IceOwl IceOwl:
Because that's what it is.
How?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 22594
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:07 pm
 


Why don't we all hold hands in a great big circle and sing Kumbiya instead. We could have smores after... :roll:


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 9956
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:08 pm
 


Uhh is there a positive to using nuclear weapons?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 22594
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:16 pm
 


Cockroaches love those things


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25516
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:18 pm
 


Tman1 Tman1:
Uhh is there a positive to using nuclear weapons?
In that situation? Yes. A very big one. Ending a massive war.

$1:
Cockroaches love those things
ROTFL


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
Profile
Posts: 13928
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:28 pm
 


ridenrain ridenrain:
Cockroaches love those things


And dont forget Lawyers.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 9956
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:28 pm
 


Tricks Tricks:
Yes. A very big one. Ending a massive war.

No, I don't think that is a positive at all. I might add the person said above against civilian populations. Nice positive there.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25516
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:33 pm
 


Tman1 Tman1:
Tricks Tricks:
Yes. A very big one. Ending a massive war.

No, I don't think that is a positive at all. I might add the person said above against civilian populations. Nice positive there.
And I bet it resulted in a lower loss of human life.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 9956
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:43 pm
 


Tricks Tricks:
And I bet it resulted in a lower loss of human life.

That's arguable for a WWII buff for and against Atomic weaponry on Japan but I think were beyond the Hiroshima and Nagasaki fiasco and I'd like to think humanity learned it's lesson. If not, that's too bad. I'm sure if Canada were bombed (obviously the axis of evil powers are not too particular at their North American targets) it would be a positive when the other side evaluates the situation. "Canada must be sacrificed in order to bring down the hated and infidel United States of America....end transmission". Me and you are dead because nuclear bombs are a positive in the right situation right? End a massive war?


Last edited by Tman1 on Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25516
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:45 pm
 


Tman1 Tman1:
Tricks Tricks:
And I bet it resulted in a lower loss of human life.

I think were beyond the Hiroshima and Nagasaki fiasco and I'd like to think humanity learned it's lesson. If not, that's too bad. I'm sure if Canada were bombed (obviously the axis of evil powers are not too particular at their North American targets) it would be a positive when the other side evaluates the situation. "Canada must be sacrificed in order to bring down the hated and infidel United States of America....end transmission". Me and you are dead because nuclear bombs are a positive in the right situation right? End a massive war?
Oh shit. I thought you meant back then. Hell no it is not a positive now. But back then it was neccessary. I hope to god we have learned, as has the rest of the world, and another nuke will never be dropped.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1205
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:51 pm
 


The problem I have with things like these petitions is that they mean pretty much NOTHING to anyone. Especially online petitions. Its almost a complete waste of time. As pessimistic as that may sound.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3693
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:46 pm
 


Tricks Tricks:
Tman1 Tman1:
Uhh is there a positive to using nuclear weapons?
In that situation? Yes. A very big one. Ending a massive war.



Are you kidding????????!!!! Bombing was absolutely not necessary! Japan was close to the defeat! But The US just needed the place for the experiment! This is f%^&ing phony to say that bombing civilian populations can be for the sake of many other lives and to end a massive war!
Holy crap! Don't you get it? The US never ever do ANYTHING for the common good!


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.