[Clogeroo]

$1:

Until my retirement is completed, yes, I am here to judge and decide.

What do you think I do when I view people thusly:

God has the final judgment though and only the Lord's matters and counts at the end of the day.

[Clogeroo]

$1:

OPP & Clog, no offence to either of you, but your use of Scripture to make an argument is kind of hollow as I've never known either of you to profess a faith in Scripture.

My faith is to God.

[BartSimpson]

OPP OPP:

Are you a christian?

I am. But I've also never professed to be good at it.

Were I to meet you in person and were you to slap me on the cheek I would only turn not to present my other cheek but to present my boot heel to your larynx.

And, in your case, I would definitely feel something and that something would predictably resemble satisfaction.

So, like I said, I'm not good at it and I am the first to admit it.

[BartSimpson]

Clogeroo Clogeroo:

$1:

OPP & Clog, no offence to either of you, but your use of Scripture to make an argument is kind of hollow as I've never known either of you to profess a faith in Scripture.

My faith is to God.

Then I stand corrected.

[OPP]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

OPP OPP:

Are you a christian?

I am. But I've also never professed to be good at it.

Were I to meet you in person and were you to slap me on the cheek I would only turn not to present my other cheek but to present my boot heel to your larynx.

And, in your case, I would definitely feel something and that something would predictably resemble satisfaction.

So, like I said, I'm not good at it and I am the first to admit it.

You don't say.

[Clogeroo]

$1:

Then I stand corrected.

Not really I pray to God not my Bible.

[BartSimpson]

Clogeroo Clogeroo:

$1:

Then I stand corrected.

Not really I pray to God not my Bible.

I can't recall anyone ever praying to a Bible - that's a new one on me.

[Clogeroo]

$1:

I can't recall anyone ever praying to a Bible - that's a new one on me.

Read what you wrote.

[BartSimpson]

Clogeroo Clogeroo:

$1:

I can't recall anyone ever praying to a Bible - that's a new one on me.

Read what you wrote.

Having faith in Scripture is not the same as deifying it.

Comparatively, I have faith in the Constitution but would never pray to it.

[stratos]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

By the way Bart, I became an NBC instructor so that I would never have to unmask in a gas hut again! Like yourself given a choice I think I would rather be shot!

That stuff is worse then pepper spray. It gets into your chest ..... God I hated that chamber.

[stratos]

OPP OPP:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

OPP OPP:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

OPP OPP:

I saw a documentary about the attacks on russian schools by Chechnian terrorists.

Oh, then quite obviously you are now an expert in the field of military and combat psychology having viewed a documentary.

OPP OPP:

The doctor present who had to examine the burnt and dismembered bodies of chilldren said in the interview that his work did not allow him to feel becaus of the emotional distress it would caus and he admitted that the tragic event he witnessed drained him of sympathy, but he does not have a gun in his hand now does he! He is not a trained killer nor is his job to eliminate other human beings

Sometimes killing the enemy is necessary to preserve innocent life.

As in the case of Iraq I presume?

In 2003 Iraq was invaded to prevent them from developing the nuclear weapons they said they were developing and to topple a hostile regime that didn't get the message from 1991 that they needed to stop threatening their neighbors.

Sad fact it that its the truth, Iran did not get the message. They fired on the planes flying in the U.N. mandated NO FLY ZONES. That act its self was an act of war thus Iran was the aggressor.

[OPP]

stratos stratos:

OPP OPP:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

OPP OPP:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

OPP OPP:

I saw a documentary about the attacks on russian schools by Chechnian terrorists.

Oh, then quite obviously you are now an expert in the field of military and combat psychology having viewed a documentary.

OPP OPP:

The doctor present who had to examine the burnt and dismembered bodies of chilldren said in the interview that his work did not allow him to feel becaus of the emotional distress it would caus and he admitted that the tragic event he witnessed drained him of sympathy, but he does not have a gun in his hand now does he! He is not a trained killer nor is his job to eliminate other human beings

Sometimes killing the enemy is necessary to preserve innocent life.

As in the case of Iraq I presume?

In 2003 Iraq was invaded to prevent them from developing the nuclear weapons they said they were developing and to topple a hostile regime that didn't get the message from 1991 that they needed to stop threatening their neighbors.

Sad fact it that its the truth, Iran did not get the message. They fired on the planes flying in the U.N. mandated NO FLY ZONES. That act its self was an act of war thus Iran was the aggressor.

Excuse me? Iran?
You're just not making any sense? Planes flying in a "no fly zone"??? Being fired at for what reason? When? How? Which planes were fired at?

[stratos]

"What foreign aggressors are occupying the United States right now?"

Mexicans

[stratos]

OPP OPP:

stratos stratos:

OPP OPP:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

OPP OPP:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

OPP OPP:

I saw a documentary about the attacks on russian schools by Chechnian terrorists.

Oh, then quite obviously you are now an expert in the field of military and combat psychology having viewed a documentary.

OPP OPP:

The doctor present who had to examine the burnt and dismembered bodies of chilldren said in the interview that his work did not allow him to feel becaus of the emotional distress it would caus and he admitted that the tragic event he witnessed drained him of sympathy, but he does not have a gun in his hand now does he! He is not a trained killer nor is his job to eliminate other human beings

Sometimes killing the enemy is necessary to preserve innocent life.

As in the case of Iraq I presume?

In 2003 Iraq was invaded to prevent them from developing the nuclear weapons they said they were developing and to topple a hostile regime that didn't get the message from 1991 that they needed to stop threatening their neighbors.

Sad fact it that its the truth, Iran did not get the message. They fired on the planes flying in the U.N. mandated NO FLY ZONES. That act its self was an act of war thus Iran was the aggressor.

Excuse me? Iran?
You're just not making any sense? Planes flying in a "no fly zone"??? Being fired at for what reason? When? How? Which planes were fired at?

After the 1991 war with Iraq, sorry I said Iran in the previous post of mine. There was a NO FLY Zone in northern and southern Iraq the the U.N. Said would be enforced. It's purpose was to ensure that no Iraqi planes would leave their area and hit neighboring countries. The U.N. had had the US, British and other countries flying patrols in these areas to ensure that they, the Iraqis were not violating the No Fly zones. The Iraqis would fire SAM missiles at the planes trying to shoot them down.

Sorry about the typo earlier thats probably whats throwing you off. My apologies.

[Mysterio10]

That is some crucial training!