This is a very important issue, but it also connects to something that I've been wondering about for a while-namely, when the anti-authoritarians themselves become the authorities.
Pierre Trudeau always portrayed himself as a contrarian, going "against the current" of popular opinion, particularly the current of most of his fellow Quebec intellectuals. His writings criticizing Quebec nationalism and separatism were what eventually led him into politics. Again, in the Meech Lake and Charlottetown debates, he portrayed himself as fighting the opinion of the elites who he said supported the accords, attacking them as "appeasers" of the separatists.
However, Quebec political scientist Léon Dion, father of the more famous Stéphane, wryly pointed out that some of the defenders of the federal status quo, like Trudeau, could themselves be very intolerant of any dissent to their vision. An undercurrent of this, coupled with a certain veiled contempt and disgust, also surfaces in some of the writings of staunch Trudeau supporters like Ron Graham or Max and Monique Nemni, portraying Trudeau's critics and opponents as lesser men who lacked his vision and integrity.
One can also see it in some circles in Alberta. Albertans have long been leaders in challenging the federal status quo, through political movements like the Progressives, the United Farmers, Social Credit and the Reform Alliance. However, we don't always express the same support for dissenters within our borders. I have read about Liberal and NDP supporters living in some parts of rural Alberta who have gotten the cold shoulder from friends who find out their political affiliations, and then there are jackasses like Craig Chandler, who infamously said that newcomers to Alberta should either vote Conservative or get out, something that attracted disgust from
progressives and
conservatives alike.
It raises the question-how many anti-authoritarians, if and when they gain the reins of power, end up being just as intolerant of dissenting voices and rabble-rousers who question
their authority and ideas?