andyt andyt:
This is a story about Paterno. The other actors in this are as despicable as he was, but this is about Paterno. You want to start a thread about the others involved who did nothing, feel free. But to let Paterno off the hook because he was famous or a good coach is sick. He's a guilty as all the others who didn't report to the police. And that includes the DA who sounds pretty eager not to press charges. Even Paterno admits he blew it:
$1:
November 9 -- Paterno issues a statement saying he will retire at the end of the 2011 football season, adding, "I wish I had done more."
This is not the 1950's anymore. So no, no RIP. The hell with the whole bunch.
Nobody's letting Paterno off the hook like you suggest. As the matter of fact it's become exactly the opposite. He appears to be the only one being villified in the press and on forums like this.
I agree that maybe he could have done more, but, at least he did something, which as far as I'm concerned is fuck of alot better than the others. But as the matter of fact it might just be the Penn State trustees who said Paterno didn't do enough and not just Paterno, just to cover their asses and the asses of those they put in power.
$1:
NEW YORK -- Penn State's trustees agonized over the future of legendary football coach Joe Paterno but ultimately decided to fire the Hall of Famer in part over what they said was his failure to go to authorities with a report of alleged sexual assault of a child by an assistant coach nearly a decade ago, according to a report published Thursday in The New York Times
$1:
The alleged 2002 shower assault ultimately resulted in charges against two university officials, athletic director Tim Curley and vice president Gary Schultz. They're charged with failing to report suspected child abuse and perjury related to their testimony before the grand jury.
Paterno's attorney defended the coach's actions in a statement, saying Paterno passed on a report about an alleged assault to his superiors at the university believing they would investigate and act appropriately
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... z1kGGRbNsiBut if saying a generic statement that you should have done more makes you guilty of negligence then I guess everyone who's ever said that after a tragedy is guilty of causing that tragedy.
This may not be the 50's and you are certainly entitled to your opinion on Paterno and his guilt, but as far as I'm concerned he did report Sandusky and it was the failure of the School to take action that resulted in this whole sordid affair.
So until someone can unequivocally post facts that prove Paterno hid Sandusky's horrid crimes then I'll continue to believe that Paterno did the right thing and it was his superiors that "didn't do enough".