N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
No. I suggest it is you who are blinded by your ideology.
I don't think so. I don't think I have much in the way of ideology. NOt permanenet ideology, anyways. It changes a lot.
$1:
If you weren't you would have noticed what you were given were the facts as are known. James O'Keefe is an activist, and that can be substantiated with proof. Hannah Giles however has no such label hanging over her head, nor is there any factual evidence with which to support it. A reasonable guess as to her Christianity, and pro-life stance however, is possible. I can go into that for you, if you like. She does claim to be a journalism student. No evidence to the contrary has been produced.
Granted then. I don't know Hannah Giles. She seems pretty active on a lot of conservative websites, but sure, let's give her the benefit of the doubt. The argument still stands with the other character.
$1:
I have not denied the possibility what you suggest happened at Philadelphia may turn out to be the case. However you appear to be suggesting this can be the only explanation. That is ideological tunnel vision. I suggested another possibility, but only a possibility. That is simply keeping an open mind. It may turn out both explanations are a little bit true. Perhaps something happened like some workers were playing along, and others weren't. We don't know. We can only guess. To suggest we do know, is suggesting we can see the future. Only ideological cognitive dissonance allows that. You have to believe in something so hard reality doesn't matter.
Not ideology--statistics. Sooner or later, just by sheer luck, you're going to run into a decent human being in this corrupt pile of crap called ACORN. Hell, even the Nazis had Shindler, right? I didn;t make any rpedictions about Philadelphia in particualr; I said "sooner or later you're going to run into a decent human being." I stand by that. Do you think there were any decent human beings working for ACORN?
I readily admit to being stumped by trying to imagine a corporate culture where people like that would be allowed to proliferate. Then again, I don't know much about Acorn, except what I've seen in the news the past few days.
$1:
From the last video however, I'm ready to make an educated guess. Something happened in Philadelphia, which is not damning enough to ACORN make it worth presenting at this time, however it is not exactly as ACORN suggests, and will be worth releasing should the public start to think ACORN's explanation matters, or should ACORN get so desperate they decide to make good on their unlikely threat of a lawsuit.
Well, I guess time will tell.