StuntmanMike StuntmanMike:
Actually, that's not correct. The NDP support dropped during the 90's, from an all time high of 43 seats under Ed Broadbent in the 1988 election, to the point they were struggling just to keep official party status under Alexa Macdonaugh a few years later. John Turner could certainly claim that the NDP was a factor in the Liberal struggles of his era, but Chretien didn't have any such problem.
9 seats in 93, 21 seats in 97 and 13 seats in 2000 for the NDP. Thats a significant amount when its your votes being drained. 43 for the NDP in 88
helped mulroney in that they didn't go to the Libs leaving him with a majority.
No matter how you spin it, you still get the left vote splitting every single election so you can't claim that vote splitting gave the Libs a majority on an equal footing with how Harper got his minority.
StuntmanMike StuntmanMike:
Absolutely right. The Tories and NDP were relentless in their attacks on Martin. It was all he could do to keep his government functioning, let alone enact new policies. But really, that's their job isn't it?
No it isn't. Thats entirely why we are in this position. Do you really think that in a minority position the oppositions only goal is to defeat the govt regardless of what they propose.
A minority govt means that the voting public does not support any one party and they must work togeather to govern. To expect anything less is simply moronic and will give us nothing but an impotent govt of bickering simps.
StuntmanMike StuntmanMike:
I don't think he'll go to any of them for support. More likely, he'll simply govern as he pleases and force the Liberals to support him, knowing full well they're in no place to fight an election for the next couple of years.
Then Harpers arrogance will be his undoing. Its his responsibility to try and make govt work. If he doesn't then yet another election in short order will be put squarely on his shoulders and the public will hold him accountable.
StuntmanMike StuntmanMike:
The Libs are in a tough spot. It would have been much better for them had the Tories won a clear Majority. That would have allowed them to go away, lick their wounds, choose a new leader, re-build their finances, all while allowing a pit-bull like Scott Brison or Gerard Kennedy to take shots at Harper in Question Period every day. In four years, they could return with a new platform, an invigorated party, and challenged for the big prize.
The rest of us will not trust Harper with a majority for a reason. He does not deserve it. I'm willing to let him govern with a minority as long as he gets support from one other party to do it.
StuntmanMike StuntmanMike:
Now, they're going to have to keep rolling over everytime Harper threatens them, further destroying Caucus morale, and further eroding their image as a legitimate opposition to the government. How can they legitimately claim to be an alternative government when they've voted with the Cons on every major initiative of their mandate?
I don't think this time round they will do that. I think a new leader will realize that it was a mistake and simply not give in and I think a new election forced on us by Harper will see alot of Greens and NDP supporters realizing that a strong Liberal showing is the only way to defeat Harper.
People are not going to give Harper a majority out of exhaustion for the same reasons he did not win it in his third attempt. He simply doesn't deserve it.