news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

B.C. natives fear violence over mine

Canadian Content
20781news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

B.C. natives fear violence over mine


Business | 207806 hits | Apr 26 9:39 pm | Posted by: Hyack
8 Comment

First Nations chiefs in B.C.'s southern Interior say thousands of their bands' members will use any means they can to stop a major mine in the Chilcotin region.

Comments

  1. by avatar andyt
    Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:03 am
    Typical pc headline. It should read "BC natives threaten violenct" but of course that won't do, since natives are always the victims.

  2. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:33 am
    "andyt" said
    Typical pc headline. It should read "BC natives threaten violenct" but of course that won't do, since natives are always the victims.

    Oh for sure. I know I'd be THRILLED if some new mine was going to be dumping tailings into my water source and killing all the fish. Shit, I was pissed at the Region of Waterloo when they decided to be the test area for adding ammonia to the water supply to "make the chlorine last longer".
    I'd be out for blood of they did something like allowing mine run off into my water supply.
    Ya know, sometimes the Natives aren't the idiots.

    "Water is worth more than gold." One day, we may just understand that.

  3. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:37 pm
    If it was their land, they would have a case. Apparently, it's not.

  4. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:28 pm
    "Brenda" said
    If it was their land, they would have a case. Apparently, it's not.


    Actually, it's unclear about who owns Fish Lake, which is the centre of the argument. If the natives indeed own the lake and depend upon the water which the company intends to poison, then I fully understand their argument.

    Even if they did not, why is it okay to kill yet another lake and rip open the land simply in the name of economic progress?

  5. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:33 pm
    Which means, imho, that the government has as much "right" as anyone else. If they would use the environmental argument, fine, but now it is "we are natives, we rely on this lake for our water, get lost".
    THAT is what annoys me. The Native card. Again.

  6. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:38 pm
    "Brenda" said
    Which means, imho, that the government has as much "right" as anyone else. If they would use the environmental argument, fine, but now it is "we are natives, we rely on this lake for our water, get lost".
    THAT is what annoys me. The Native card. Again.


    Well, I agree that the 'sacred' argument holds no water (pardon the pun). Apparently someone needs to advise natives that the 'sacred' card is rather worn these days.

    That being said, the government has no right to give the green light to a company set on destroying their water source. Too much of that is allowed to happen.

  7. by avatar andyt
    Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:24 pm
    "Gunnair" said


    why is it okay to kill yet another lake and rip open the land simply in the name of economic progress?


    What's special about this lake? Ripping open the land is how we've always made our money. Try to tell Alberta to no rip open the land. Or any other resource province - pretty well most of them. Of course all environmental safeguards should be met, but we've always been ecorapists, we'll probably be escapists till we disappear as a species.

  8. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Sat May 01, 2010 6:17 am
    "andyt" said


    why is it okay to kill yet another lake and rip open the land simply in the name of economic progress?


    What's special about this lake? Ripping open the land is how we've always made our money. Try to tell Alberta to no rip open the land. Or any other resource province - pretty well most of them. Of course all environmental safeguards should be met, but we've always been ecorapists, we'll probably be escapists till we disappear as a species.

    Fresh water.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net