CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:46 am
 


<strong>Title: </strong> <a href="/link.php?id=14478" target="_blank">Pakistan is no ally</a> (click to view)

<strong>Category:</strong> <a href="/modules.php?name=News_Links&file=category&catid=1" target="_blank">Political</a>
<strong>Posted By: </strong> <a href="/modules.php?name=Your_Account&op=userinfo&username=Scape" target="_blank">Scape</a>
<strong>Date: </strong> 2006-10-08 12:19:04
<strong>Canadian</strong>


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15102
PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:46 am
 


I guess this is how they thank the west for all the help after thier earthquake.


Offline
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 814
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 1:29 am
 


In reading Musharraf's memoirs I was struck by the scope of it's dishonesty and the amount of denial embodied in it. Pakistan is basically edging towards a civil war under his rule, and by aiding the Taliban (and Al Quaida) he is trying to mollify the Pushtan in the eastern provinces. It's a temporary fix at best, but the real problem in that (eventual) civil war is: to what extent will India (and or China, and or the U.S., and or Russia, and or,...) become involved?

It was well known in intelligence circles before 9/11 that the ISI was aiding Al Quaida and the Taliban. Was there ever any reason to believe that that would change because of the invasion of Afghanistan?

You could fault him for being a false ally, but no more than us for being fooled.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15681
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:54 am
 


GunPlumber GunPlumber:
In reading Musharraf's memoirs I was struck by the scope of it's dishonesty and the amount of denial embodied in it. Pakistan is basically edging towards a civil war under his rule, and by aiding the Taliban (and Al Quaida) he is trying to mollify the Pushtan in the eastern provinces. It's a temporary fix at best, but the real problem in that (eventual) civil war is: to what extent will India (and or China, and or the U.S., and or Russia, and or,...) become involved?

It was well known in intelligence circles before 9/11 that the ISI was aiding Al Quaida and the Taliban. Was there ever any reason to believe that that would change because of the invasion of Afghanistan?

You could fault him for being a false ally, but no more than us for being fooled.


Wow, I agree. Totally.


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 463
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:41 pm
 


I found this enlightening.

"How the west destroyed Afghanistan"


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Dallas Stars


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 18770
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:53 pm
 


Didn't the west help Pakastain and India NOT go to war a few years ago. Maybe the west was mistaken and should have let India kick their ass.


Offline
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 814
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:07 am
 


stratos stratos:
Didn't the west help Pakastain and India NOT go to war a few years ago. Maybe the west was mistaken and should have let India kick their ass.


So were you hoping a country with one billion people; many who have a deep-seated resentent of "the West", a nuclear arsenal, and who continually flirt with a closer alliance with China, should've turned Pakistan into a parking lot? And thereby puttting themselves (the Indians) within spitting distance of the Persian Gulf, Eastern Europe and Russia, would be a good thing?

Maybe sometimes we could think [more] of the possible consequences of sticking our noses in other peoples business. Then Newton's Third Law wouldn't be such a shock, when the pendulum returns and smacks us in the face (or sends hundred story office towers crashing to the ground).

Of all the places to wage a war against terrorism, Afghanistan and Iraq had to be the dumbest. But then those places, from which the anti-western "terrorists" originate, have well-equipped armies (some with nukes), and hold a lot of U.S. debt. Which make them substantially less attractive as adversaries.

[hr]

And to leave on a positive note: give Musharraf's autobiography a pass and pick-up a copy of Noah Richler's, "This Is My Country, What Is Yours?". It will give you a stronger sense of a Canadian identity, while at the same time thoroughly confounding you as to what that means. Both of which, to my mind, are a good thing.


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 463
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:14 am
 


Some AFGHANISTAN History

Excerpts from above link:

.............................

Afghanistan was not always a country totally dominated by warlords and reactionary Islamic fundamentalism.

This brand of Islam was largely imported into the country as part of the U.S.-inspired, Cold War effort to defeat the Soviets. For a brief period, the country had a progressive, secular government which, according to University of Winnipeg professor John Ryan, "affirmed the separation of church and state, labour unions were legalized, health care and education became priorities, women were given equal rights, and girls were to go to school...A program was being developed for major land reform."
...

Oil and gas are part of every U.S. intervention in the Middle East, and the U.S. had no qualms about dealing with the Taliban in the 1990s. Washington began to pour millions into Taliban coffers in the hope of signing a contract with U.S. oil giant Unocal to build a gas pipeline south from the Caspian Basin to Pakistan. The negotiations broke down in the spring of 2001 -- just months before 9-11. As for those attacks, they were planned in Germany, carried out by Saudis and were almost certainly done without the knowledge of the isolationist Taliban. When the U.S. demanded that Osama bin Laden be handed over, the Taliban agreed to turn him over to an international tribunal upon seeing evidence of his guilt. But the U.S. had no such evidence. Instead, they invaded.

The government of Hamid Karzai is constantly touted as having been "democratically elected" and it is fair to say that Afghans voted in the election because they hoped it might make a difference.

But the Karzai government is totally dependent for its survival on the U.S. and is heavily influenced by the U.S. oil industry.

A corrupt 'democracy'

Afghanistan's democracy is a fraud and operates more as a grim coalition of mujahedeen, warlords, druglords, oil company executives and U.S. agents.

Following 9-11, the U.S. recruited and armed its old mujahedeen creation to help in the task of defeating the Taliban, renaming them the "Northern Alliance."


This is the context for Canada's involvement in Afghanistan. When Hamid Karzai visited Canada and told the House of Commons and the Canadian people that our troops are desperately needed in his country, he didn't tell the whole story. And who would blame him?

.................................

be safe


Offline
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 814
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:12 am
 


saga saga:
Some AFGHANISTAN History

Excerpts from above link:

.............................

Afghanistan was not always a country totally dominated by warlords and reactionary Islamic fundamentalism.

This brand of Islam was largely imported into the country as part of the U.S.-inspired, Cold War effort to defeat the Soviets. For a brief period, the country had a progressive, secular government which, according to University of Winnipeg professor John Ryan, "affirmed the separation of church and state, labour unions were legalized, health care and education became priorities, women were given equal rights, and girls were to go to school...A program was being developed for major land reform."
...

Oil and gas are part of every U.S. intervention in the Middle East, and the U.S. had no qualms about dealing with the Taliban in the 1990s. Washington began to pour millions into Taliban coffers in the hope of signing a contract with U.S. oil giant Unocal to build a gas pipeline south from the Caspian Basin to Pakistan. The negotiations broke down in the spring of 2001 -- just months before 9-11. As for those attacks, they were planned in Germany, carried out by Saudis and were almost certainly done without the knowledge of the isolationist Taliban. When the U.S. demanded that Osama bin Laden be handed over, the Taliban agreed to turn him over to an international tribunal upon seeing evidence of his guilt. But the U.S. had no such evidence. Instead, they invaded.

The government of Hamid Karzai is constantly touted as having been "democratically elected" and it is fair to say that Afghans voted in the election because they hoped it might make a difference.

But the Karzai government is totally dependent for its survival on the U.S. and is heavily influenced by the U.S. oil industry.

A corrupt 'democracy'

Afghanistan's democracy is a fraud and operates more as a grim coalition of mujahedeen, warlords, druglords, oil company executives and U.S. agents.

Following 9-11, the U.S. recruited and armed its old mujahedeen creation to help in the task of defeating the Taliban, renaming them the "Northern Alliance."


This is the context for Canada's involvement in Afghanistan. When Hamid Karzai visited Canada and told the House of Commons and the Canadian people that our troops are desperately needed in his country, he didn't tell the whole story. And who would blame him?

.................................

be safe


Living is easy with eyes closed
Misunderstanding all you see
Its getting hard to be someone, but it all works out
It doesnt matter much to me


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.