[gaulois]

Good post (or question) Zachary. Answer depends very much on personal criteria such as number of new insights produced, resulting direct actions, minimum rambling and ranting, best moderation, numbers of worthwile insightful members lost (or gained) through this discussion, etc... May be more interesting to discuss what are the Vive performance criteria. <br /> <br />It may also be interesting to discuss what were the top-10 weak discussion areas in regards to Canadian Sovereingty (and perhaps why they were weak). 2005 risks otherwise being a repeat of 2004. Or perhaps this is what the majority is happy with? <br /> <br />