CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30610
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:56 am
 


Title: Poland the next Bay of Pigs
Category: Business
Posted By: tritium
Date: 2008-08-26 11:51:19


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7710
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:56 am
 


Canada needs to join the US missile defence shield.


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
Profile
Posts: 32460
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:57 am
 


Why?.......everyone knows it doesn't work. Even the Russians.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35015
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:04 pm
 


We need missile defence about as much as we need asteroid defence. That is to say not at all for the cost/benefit ratio is makes the whole issue moot. It's 21st century snake oil for militarists, nothing more.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 5164
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:05 pm
 


Apparently the Americans claim they have worked all the bugs out, if thats true or not it remains to be seen. I also highly doubt the left wing will let anything like that happen, they are already raising a stink about whats going on up there at the moment.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:09 pm
 


A couple things....

1. If everyone is so sure that missile defenses don't work then why get all upset about their deployment? Wouldn't the proper reaction be: "Oh, those silly Americans wasting money on missile defense!"

2. The reaction of the Russians to threaten Poland with nuclear weapons is the finest argument for Poland to have a missile defense program that I can think of. It is also a fine argument for Poland to pursue a nuclear weapons program of their own.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:12 pm
 


Scape Scape:
We need missile defence about as much as we need asteroid defence.


You're a little out of step with the consensus of scientific thought on this one.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... roids.html

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... eroid.html

http://www.space.com/news/060628_neo_workshop.html


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35015
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:13 pm
 


1. Ever heard of keeping up with the Jones? Everyone will be expected to support the new shiny.

2. Escalation as a deterrent only works so far, there is a reason they call it brinkmanship. Once you go over the edge, no take backs. Would you support Cuban Nukes?


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
Profile
Posts: 272
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:14 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:


2. The reaction of the Russians to threaten Poland with nuclear weapons is the finest argument for Poland to have a missile defense program that I can think of. It is also a fine argument for Poland to pursue a nuclear weapons program of their own.


i disagree. The russians are threatening poland BECAUSE of the missile defense, and because they question their intentions.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 5164
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:17 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
A couple things....

1. If everyone is so sure that missile defenses don't work then why get all upset about their deployment? Wouldn't the proper reaction be: "Oh, those silly Americans wasting money on missile defense!"

2. The reaction of the Russians to threaten Poland with nuclear weapons is the finest argument for Poland to have a missile defense program that I can think of. It is also a fine argument for Poland to pursue a nuclear weapons program of their own.

#2 Is a VERY bad idea though. I am all for defence, but the less nukes on the planet the better.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:18 pm
 


Demian_164 Demian_164:
i disagree. The russians are threatening poland BECAUSE of the missile defense, and because they question their intentions.


But missile defenses don't work (right?) so what's to get upset about?


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35015
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:21 pm
 


The trillion dollar price tag comes to mind...


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
Profile
Posts: 272
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:21 pm
 


i never said they didnt work did i? The russians question whether it really is a missile defense system or if it is targeted at them. Like i said, they dont trust the stated intentions of the program-they dont believe it is strictly missile defense-which is why they are upset.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:22 pm
 


Scape Scape:
1. Ever heard of keeping up with the Jones? Everyone will be expected to support the new shiny.


The Russians already have the most extensive ABM defenses in the world, why should they be upset if Poland wants to be able to shoot down a mere ten missiles when Russia can supposedly shoot down hundreds of them?

Scape Scape:
2. Escalation as a deterrent only works so far, there is a reason they call it brinkmanship. Once you go over the edge, no take backs. Would you support Cuban Nukes?


Please explain to me the logic of condemning defensive weapons while being perfectly fine with offensive weapons?

What is wrong with a nation that has no offensive nuclear capability being able to defend itself and others from nuclear attack?


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:22 pm
 


Scape Scape:
The trillion dollar price tag comes to mind...


You're not paying for it so your point is????


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 120 posts ]  1  2  3  4  5 ... 8  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.