Link Related to Canada in some say

Canada not at war with ISIS, Trudeau says following Brussels attacks


Political | 207755 hits | Mar 23 12:47 pm | Posted by: N_Fiddledog
67 Comment

The Liberal government says Canada is not at war with Islamic militants -- a view not shared by ally France.

Comments

  1. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:10 pm
    Einstein was right about stupidity....he keeps setting new standards.

  2. by avatar BRAH
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:14 pm
    Justin just slapped every ally in the face who's at War with them. Fucking Embarrassing! :roll:

  3. by avatar BartSimpson Gold Member
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:14 pm
    Trudope.

  4. by avatar DrCaleb
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:15 pm
    :lol:

    Yea, I guess they'll take his word on it.

  5. by avatar Delwin
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:16 pm
    A declaration of war by Canada is a formal declaration issued by the Government of Canada (the federal Crown-in-Council) indicating that a state of war exists between Canada and another nation. It is an exercise of the Royal Prerogative on the constitutional advice of the ministers of the Crown in Cabinet and does not require the direct approval of the Parliament of Canada, though such can be sought by the government. Since gaining the authority to declare war under the Statute of Westminster 1931, Canada has declared war only during the Second World War.


    Nope not at war. The condition for war to exist between 2 nations is well defined and there is absolutely no need to muddy those waters.

    We don't need a war on drugs, a war on marriage, a war on poverty, a war on ignorance, a war on terror, etc

    You see none of those things are actually war. Words matter, lets keep it that way.

  6. by avatar sandorski
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:18 pm
    He was just being a stickler about the term "war". Should have not said it, but whatever.

  7. by avatar DrCaleb
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:23 pm
    "Delwin" said

    You see none of those things are actually war. Words matter, lets keep it that way.



    So when ISIS says "We are coming and we will destroy you. . ." they didn't declare war on us? I guess it's OK then if we ignore their declaration. I'm sure they'll understand.

  8. by avatar martin14
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:25 pm
    "DrCaleb" said

    You see none of those things are actually war. Words matter, lets keep it that way.



    So when ISIS says "We are coming and we will destroy you. . ." they didn't declare war on us? I guess it's OK then if we ignore their declaration. I'm sure they'll understand.



  9. by avatar Delwin
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:27 pm
    No, only 2 nations can be at war, a terrorist threat is not a declaration of war.

    Your willingness to accept their declaration as legitimate only validates their "state".

    They are terrorists, they are criminals, we are on a mission to destroy them. We are not at war with this non-existent state because there is no such thing as war with a non-state.

  10. by avatar BRAH
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:35 pm
    "martin14" said

    You see none of those things are actually war. Words matter, lets keep it that way.



    So when ISIS says "We are coming and we will destroy you. . ." they didn't declare war on us? I guess it's OK then if we ignore their declaration. I'm sure they'll understand.




  11. by avatar PluggyRug
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:36 pm
    "Delwin" said
    No, only 2 nations can be at war, a terrorist threat is not a declaration of war.

    Your willingness to accept their declaration as legitimate only validates their "state".

    They are terrorists, they are criminals, we are on a mission to destroy them. We are not at war with this non-existent state because there is no such thing as war with a non-state.



    Jeez Delwin...you're spinning fast attempting to justify Justin's major gaff, sit down for a minute you must be awful dizzy.

  12. by avatar BRAH
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:38 pm
    "DrCaleb" said

    You see none of those things are actually war. Words matter, lets keep it that way.



    So when ISIS says "We are coming and we will destroy you. . ." they didn't declare war on us? I guess it's OK then if we ignore their declaration. I'm sure they'll understand.

    You know the video targeting West Edmonton Mall wasn't a declaration of War or threats of an attack.

  13. by avatar Delwin
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:40 pm
    There is no spinning. It cannot be defined as war. Plain and simple. End of story. If you want to grant them state status they we could possibly declare war until then it is completely impossible by the textbook definition. Google it people.

  14. by avatar PluggyRug
    Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:43 pm
    "Delwin" said
    There is no spinning. It cannot be defined as war. Plain and simple. End of story. If you want to grant them state status they we could possibly declare war until then it is completely impossible by the textbook definition. Google it people.



    All I see another dizzy spell.



view comments in forum
You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile