Muslim teacher is suing school after she was sacked for objecting to video of 9/11 being shownWorld | 181680 hits | Sep 25 3:57 pm | Posted by: N_Fiddledog  Suriyah Bi, 24, lost her job at Heartlands Academy in Birmingham, after just a week of being a teaching assistant in a year seven class there and is now pursuing claims for religious discrimination.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2023 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2023 by Canadaka.net
islamic country of her choice where she can teach about the magnificent 19 hijackers and how they killed almost 3000 people to illustate to us how The Religion of Peace works.
It says the film is graphic that is rated for 18+ and she objected to it being shown to 11yr olds and 12 yr olds.
Right now it's a case of he said she said and we'll have to wait to see the outcome to find the truth.
They complained there had been no need for the preliminary hearing and were considering making a claim for costs against Suriyah for causing delays.
Mr Broughton said she could go ahead with her legal claims at a full hearing later this year and he would not consider a claim for costs at this stage.
I also wonder why she's suing for "religious discrimination" when unfair dismissal would have covered the entire reason she claims to have been fired for and that was protecting children to young to see violence like the 9/11 video?
let her move to whatever shithole of an
islamic country of her choice where she can teach about the magnificent 19 hijackers and how they killed almost 3000 people to illustate to us how The Religion of Peace works.
Huh? Are you wasted?
I also wonder why she's suing for "religious discrimination" when unfair dismissal would have covered the entire reason she claims to have been fired for and that was protecting children to young to see violence like the 9/11 video?
Because that's how law suits work: cast the widest net possible and sue everyone for everything remotely related to the incident.
There's more to this story than the article states.
Right now it's a case of he said she said and we'll have to wait to see the outcome to find the truth.
They complained there had been no need for the preliminary hearing and were considering making a claim for costs against Suriyah for causing delays.
Mr Broughton said she could go ahead with her legal claims at a full hearing later this year and he would not consider a claim for costs at this stage.
I also wonder why she's suing for "religious discrimination" when unfair dismissal would have covered the entire reason she claims to have been fired for and that was protecting children to young to see violence like the 9/11 video?
She'd only worked there for a week and probably has a probation period so she can't sue for unfair dismissal... they can fire you for any reason, or no reason at all... but not for "religious discrimination".
The article doesn't say anything about her being a terrorist sympathizer or anti-American or objecting for any reason related to her being a Muslim
It says the film is graphic that is rated for 18+ and she objected to it being shown to 11yr olds and 12 yr olds.
And she would be right.
They shouldn't have been shown that video.
If this is true she's right especially when these kids could go on their phones and watch horrific 9/11 shit so why watch it in the class room?
She'd only worked there for a week and probably has a probation period so she can't sue for unfair dismissal... they can fire you for any reason, or no reason at all... but not for "religious discrimination".
While that's true in many jobs, it's likely not for a teaching job. It certainly wouldn't be the case in Ontario. If this were Canada, she'd be in the union her first day on the job and whatever probationary period exists would be addressed in the collectively bargained contract. Not sure about Britain but, in Canada, I've never seen a CBA that allowed someone to be dismissed arbitrarily no matter how long on the job.
Was what is shown really any different that can be seen on the news every year?
Just because can do something or watch something, doesn't mean it should be taught in school.
Was what is shown really any different that can be seen on the news every year?
Just because can do something or watch something, doesn't mean it should be taught in school.
You're not wrong, but I'm more surprised they haven't seen it already if it is similar to news coverage.
Was what is shown really any different that can be seen on the news every year?
Just because can do something or watch something, doesn't mean it should be taught in school.
Yep, I would have been interested in the School Board reaction if I had shown a porn vid to my grade 7 class. " But they can see all that on their phones!"
She'd only worked there for a week and probably has a probation period so she can't sue for unfair dismissal... they can fire you for any reason, or no reason at all... but not for "religious discrimination".
While that's true in many jobs, it's likely not for a teaching job. It certainly wouldn't be the case in Ontario. If this were Canada, she'd be in the union her first day on the job and whatever probationary period exists would be addressed in the collectively bargained contract. Not sure about Britain but, in Canada, I've never seen a CBA that allowed someone to be dismissed arbitrarily no matter how long on the job.
Just curious. Are teaching assistants covered by a CBA?