The argument that oxygen was once toxic for life is irrelevant for the global warming debate.
Why is it irrelevent, two molecules of O are reqired to make CO2.
Deflection is noted and discarded.
Benoit
CKA Elite
Posts: 4661
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 8:14 pm
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
Benoit Benoit:
The argument that oxygen was once toxic for life is irrelevant for the global warming debate.
Why is it irrelevent, two molecules of O are reqired to make CO2.
Deflection is noted and discarded.
Because the only living specie that can know that two molecules of O are required to make CO2 is humans.
N_Fiddledog
CKA Uber
Posts: 26145
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 9:03 pm
The thing I get a kick out of from Benoit is he seems to fade in and out of reality. Either way he seems to feel he's being monstrous clever, because he doesn't seem to feel the distinction matters.
He was almost lucid for a while there, then oxygen was toxic, and plants were involved in warfare, and now I haven't a clue what he's talking about. It's a bit of a hoot.
Is there a "most likely to forget their meds" medal?
Benoit
CKA Elite
Posts: 4661
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 9:15 pm
Back to the original post, this thread is only about "additionality".
CKA Uber 
