[N_Fiddledog]

Delwin Delwin:

[
That's funny, you are criticizing my using an award winning journalist from Israel. Have you even read your own posts? Your argument is that this Israeli Jew is way too biased in favor of Palestine ?

No my argument is that he's biased, and he is. Not just him but the publication he was posting in. Of course, he's won awards. One thing the left love to do is give each other awards. I'm surprised he hasn't won a Nobel peace price, or as it's known around my house the Prog of the Year award.

You point out bias when you think you see it. It is therefore "kosher" that I point it out when I do. But it's one of those things the left only has a problem with when somebody else does it, right?

$1:

I guess it sucks that there are many Jews who support my position and zero Palestinians that support yours. You should ask yourself what that says about your position.

Zero Palestinians that defend Israel's position? I don't know about that.

[BartSimpson]

Delwin Delwin:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Delwin Delwin:

So according to your link, they are most closely related to Ashkenazi Jews, a Semitic people, since the Philistines were a non-Semitic group, you were wrong on that one too.

Uh-huh. Now go back and actually read the paper before making yourself look like an ass yet again.

I don't have too, it is completely irrelevant, first of all and the whole world calls them Arab, their are even a member of the Arab league of Nations, so your point is moot.

I'm a member of the local NAACP but that doesn't make me black. But by your logic I suppose I need to stock up on Jericurl.

Edit: Could you also bother yourself on the proper usage of they're, there, and their?

Thanks.

[Delwin]

K, maybe you should call the dictionary companies up and tell them they have made a mistake. Or maybe you could write your own.


Border guards put new guns to use
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/border-gu ... e-1.689501

[BartSimpson]

Delwin Delwin:

K, maybe you should call the dictionary companies up and tell them they have made a mistake. Or maybe you could write your own.


Border guards put new guns to use
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/border-gu ... e-1.689501

Look, retard, comparing our borders that have armed guards along maybe 1% of their total length to a border that has armed guards along its' entire length is idiocy.

But you're bound and determined to be an idiot so why am I bothering?

[Delwin]

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

Delwin Delwin:

[
That's funny, you are criticizing my using an award winning journalist from Israel. Have you even read your own posts? Your argument is that this Israeli Jew is way too biased in favor of Palestine ?

No my argument is that he's biased, and he is. Not just him but the publication he was posting in. Of course, he's won awards. One thing the left love to do is give each other awards. I'm surprised he hasn't won a Nobel peace price, or as it's known around my house the Prog of the Year award.

You point out bias when you think you see it. It is therefore "kosher" that I point it out when I do. But it's one of those things the left only has a problem with when somebody else does it, right?

$1:

I guess it sucks that there are many Jews who support my position and zero Palestinians that support yours. You should ask yourself what that says about your position.

Zero Palestinians that defend Israel's position? I don't know about that.

No I said that support your position how exactly do either of these people support your position? (16 year old kid Really? the best you could do ?)

[Delwin]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Delwin Delwin:

K, maybe you should call the dictionary companies up and tell them they have made a mistake. Or maybe you could write your own.


Border guards put new guns to use
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/border-gu ... e-1.689501

Look, retard, comparing our borders that have armed guards along maybe 1% of their total length to a border that has armed guards along its' entire length is idiocy.

But you're bound and determined to be an idiot so why am I bothering?

OK, you've resorted to name calling, I think everyone knows what that means.

You are saying the strength of the border is a very good measure of the relationship between 2 countries, hmm interesting. I happen to think there are probably some better measures though.

[N_Fiddledog]

Delwin Delwin:

No I said that support your position how exactly do either of these people support your position? (16 year old kid Really? the best you could do ?)

If they're pro-Israel they support my position. And yes the opinion of the youth matter. They'll be taking over from the old fanatics soon, and their age does not contradict the fact 2 > 0. That's just math.

That really smart Palestinian girl up there is Christy Anastas. She's well known lately for a speech she delivered as part of a panel at Uppsala university in Sweden. You should watch it. It's educational.

[Delwin]

Yeah I don't have 25 mins to kill, everyone I posted is pro-Israel. They are in fact Israeli, they are also pro-human rights and anti-occupation. And I watched a few minutes, seems pretty random.

[BartSimpson]

Delwin Delwin:

OK, you've resorted to name calling, I think everyone knows what that means.

Yes, it means you asked me for proof, refused to read it, and then pretended that what I'd cited wasn't in a paper whose very subject was the issue I'd cited. Either you're being a deliberate troll (which would be inexcusable) or else you're a retard who is unable to read and comprehend the very information he'd asked for.

I'd rather think that you're intellectually challenged (which is what we call retards these days) than a dick.

Either way, I'll admit being frustrated by your obstinacy.

[N_Fiddledog]

Delwin Delwin:

Yeah I don't have 25 mins to kill, everyone I posted is pro-Israel. They are in fact Israeli, they are also pro-human rights and anti-occupation. And I watched a few minutes, seems pretty random.

According to Wikipedia Gideon Levy has been called a propagandist for Hamas. Haaretz has been criticized for being anti-Israel. The people who damned me for using a video of from Memri (which admittedly is also biased, but pro-Israel) cannot be expected to be taken seriously if they say critique for having a pro-Israel bias is fine, but critique cannot be noticed if the media being examined has an anti-Israel, pro Hamas bias. And pro-Hamas is not pro-Israel. Such a suggestion would be ridiculous.

[BRAH]

A close friend who's a Canadian citizen has family in Israel and once again they've been hiding out in a bomb shelters while Hamas fires their rockets. She sees the Anti-Israeli seniment in Canada, it breaks her heart and digusts her because it's so easy for anyone in the safety and security of Canada to sit back and judge Israel when they have no real connection to ether side of this conflict.

[BartSimpson]

On the radio just now they played the cleric of the Al-Aqsa mosque praising Israel for protecting one of the holiest sites in Islam from Hamas. Seems the parts from a Hamas missile landed on the grounds of the mosque indicating that it could have been damaged had the Qassam missile impacted on it.

[Delwin]

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

Delwin Delwin:

Yeah I don't have 25 mins to kill, everyone I posted is pro-Israel. They are in fact Israeli, they are also pro-human rights and anti-occupation. And I watched a few minutes, seems pretty random.

According to Wikipedia Gideon Levy has been called a propagandist for Hamas. Haaretz has been criticized for being anti-Israel. The people who damned me for using a video of from Memri (which admittedly is also biased, but pro-Israel) cannot be expected to be taken seriously if they say critique for having a pro-Israel bias is fine, but critique cannot be noticed if the media being examined has an anti-Israel, pro Hamas bias. And pro-Hamas is not pro-Israel. Such a suggestion would be ridiculous.

Right called by whom though ? Political adversaries ? Sure. People calling him something isn't evidence of anything. He is born and raised Israeli and served in the IDF, others call him a patriot. What evidence do you have that he is anything but pro-Israel ?

And yes, backing IDF actions using an organization that is founded by an IDF colonel has zero merit. Not sure why you don't see that that is the exact opposite of contesting IDF actions with the opinion of a former IDF soldier. It's really the difference between a strong argument and a weak one in this case.

[Delwin]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Delwin Delwin:

OK, you've resorted to name calling, I think everyone knows what that means.

Yes, it means you asked me for proof, refused to read it, and then pretended that what I'd cited wasn't in a paper whose very subject was the issue I'd cited. Either you're being a deliberate troll (which would be inexcusable) or else you're a retard who is unable to read and comprehend the very information he'd asked for.

I'd rather think that you're intellectually challenged (which is what we call retards these days) than a dick.

Either way, I'll admit being frustrated by your obstinacy.

Yeah, ad hominem attacks are usually the sign of poor debate skills, and I understand your frustration, your argument is semantic and holds no water.

[N_Fiddledog]

Delwin Delwin:

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

Delwin Delwin:

Yeah I don't have 25 mins to kill, everyone I posted is pro-Israel. They are in fact Israeli, they are also pro-human rights and anti-occupation. And I watched a few minutes, seems pretty random.

According to Wikipedia Gideon Levy has been called a propagandist for Hamas. Haaretz has been criticized for being anti-Israel. The people who damned me for using a video of from Memri (which admittedly is also biased, but pro-Israel) cannot be expected to be taken seriously if they say critique for having a pro-Israel bias is fine, but critique cannot be noticed if the media being examined has an anti-Israel, pro Hamas bias. And pro-Hamas is not pro-Israel. Such a suggestion would be ridiculous.

Right called by whom though ? Political adversaries ? Sure. People calling him something isn't evidence of anything. He is born and raised Israeli and served in the IDF, others call him a patriot. What evidence do you have that he is anything but pro-Israel ?

And yes, backing IDF actions using an organization that is founded by an IDF colonel has zero merit. Not sure why you don't see that that is the exact opposite of contesting IDF actions with the opinion of a former IDF soldier. It's really the difference between a strong argument and a weak one in this case.

I don't see why you're having such a problem with this.

Wikipedia is offered as a reference for the idea media with a pro-Israel bias has been criticized. Wikipedia is offered as a reference for the idea media with an anti-Israel bias has been criticized.

I'm willing to accept both. You tell me only the side you favor can be referenced. Can you seriously not see how nuts that sounds?