CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2031
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:31 am
 


IcedCap IcedCap:
hwacker hwacker:
And the coupe, CBC will be private when Harper gets in, gonna suck to be a Liberal in Canada for a long while


Coupe? wtf has a hatchback got to do with anything


It's coup


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 10896
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:32 am
 


VitaminC VitaminC:
IcedCap IcedCap:
hwacker hwacker:
And the coupe, CBC will be private when Harper gets in, gonna suck to be a Liberal in Canada for a long while


Coupe? wtf has a hatchback got to do with anything


It's coup


coup d'état


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 10896
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:33 am
 


Avro Avro:
hwacker hwacker:
ziggy ziggy:
Avro Avro:
No, it's CUPE.
I did 22 years in one of Canada's bigger unions and their all as crooked as a dogs hind leg and corrupt as hell. I seen shit that would make pm PM jelous.


Don't worry Ziggy, Monday morning the CAW will see what the corruption has done to the autoworkers.

It’s not the workers, it’s the unions that have outlived their usefulness in Northamerica.


In other word GM workers make to much and have it to good.

You really have no clue what you are talking about, I will show you if you have the guts but you will have to meet me in Toronto.


It's Ford on Monday, doofus.





PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:41 am
 


Avro Avro:
hwacker hwacker:
Avro Avro:
hwacker hwacker:
ziggy ziggy:
Avro Avro:
No, it's CUPE.
I did 22 years in one of Canada's bigger unions and their all as crooked as a dogs hind leg and corrupt as hell. I seen shit that would make pm PM jelous.


Don't worry Ziggy, Monday morning the CAW will see what the corruption has done to the autoworkers.

It’s not the workers, it’s the unions that have outlived their usefulness in Northamerica.


In other word GM workers make to much and have it to good.

You really have no clue what you are talking about, I will show you if you have the guts but you will have to meet me in Toronto.


It's Ford on Monday, doofus.


So I take that as a no?


Sounds like your asking him for a date. 8O





PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:49 am
 


Avro Avro:
ziggy ziggy:
Avro Avro:
hwacker hwacker:
Avro Avro:
hwacker hwacker:
ziggy ziggy:
Avro Avro:
No, it's CUPE.
I did 22 years in one of Canada's bigger unions and their all as crooked as a dogs hind leg and corrupt as hell. I seen shit that would make pm PM jelous.


Don't worry Ziggy, Monday morning the CAW will see what the corruption has done to the autoworkers.

It’s not the workers, it’s the unions that have outlived their usefulness in Northamerica.


In other word GM workers make to much and have it to good.

You really have no clue what you are talking about, I will show you if you have the guts but you will have to meet me in Toronto.


It's Ford on Monday, doofus.


So I take that as a no?


Sounds like your asking him for a date. 8O


Actually he suggested some time ago that he wants me to dress up like Belinda Stronach.

No actually I have been trying to meet him because he stated he ahs never met a liberal he couldn't drop so I have called him on it. Now I have voted for several political parties but in recent years lefty ones so I guess I qualify although I hardly class the Liberals as liberal.

Anyways.....when?......where?


Well,my granny is standing behind me reading this,she has a glass eye and a wooden leg and she's about ready to come down and kick your ass. :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20460
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:06 am
 


ziggy ziggy:

Because the govt that gets in affects your livelihood,are you supporting the libs because of what they will do for canada*cough cough* or for you?

As for the EI fund,your the one allways walking around puffing out your chest and bragging how Martin balanced the budget when all the time it was folks paying into the EI fund that harnessed the burden,check your paystub from 4 years ago and compare the EI contributions. It's sposed to be an insurance fund dude,paid for by workers so they dont have to dumpster dive during downtimes. It was never meant to be Martin's private slush fund which it has become.


1) The privatization that i favour for Canada would not affect my position all that much if at all since the company I now work for is private.

2) Whether the EI money was kept in a bank accounr or used to pay down the debt wouldn't have affected the amount I paid because the EI payments were always set with higher unemployment then current levels in mind. A case could be made for we should have been paying less but if suddenly the amount we were paying out suddenly exceeded the amount collected then the feds would be on the hock.

3) Had they used it to fund additional social programs you would have a case but since they used it to pay down the debt, which helped all Canadians equally and benefitted all political parties in the long run, you don't have a case.

Strange how you scream about "how they stole from EI" yet make no mention that paying down the debt was in fact a noble sacrifical endevour because though it beefitted uss all very few people care about it or credit them with it (as you cons prove daily).

BTW, US style privatization would likely raise healthcare wages yet I oppose it because its not a good ides for Canada.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:07 am
 


Just to remind you folks why I don't trust polls:

According to the polls in August 2004 Bush's numbers were in "free fall" and Kerry was leading. Even right up to the election the major polls such as the New York Times, Gallup, and Field had Kerry decisively ahead of Bush - the NYT had Kerry ahead of Bush by 12 points just before the election.

Election day returns were a different thing altogther.

I don't doubt that the same principles are in play in Canada right now, too, since Canadian politicians and media relations firms hire the same people their US counterparts hire.

The fact that the polls say that things are dire for anyone but the Liberals would indicate the opposite to me.

The technique is called "push polling" when instead of polling the trend you use the poll to direct the trend.

If the polls come out late today showing the Liberals safely ahead then on Monday I fully expect to see them tossed out on their butts.

But that's just me.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
Profile
Posts: 1176
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:13 am
 


Another pinch of salt that should be taken with Canadian polls is that historically Liberal voters are much less likely to actually vote compared to Tories and NDP. The stats show that for any election only two thirds of those who say they'll vote Lib make it to the polls, for the otehr party's its a much higher pecentage.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20460
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:17 am
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Just to remind you folks why I don't trust polls:

According to the polls in August 2004 Bush's numbers were in "free fall" and Kerry was leading. Even right up to the election the major polls such as the New York Times, Gallup, and Field had Kerry decisively ahead of Bush - the NYT had Kerry ahead of Bush by 12 points just before the election.

Election day returns were a different thing altogther.

I don't doubt that the same principles are in play in Canada right now, too, since Canadian politicians and media relations firms hire the same people their US counterparts hire.

The fact that the polls say that things are dire for anyone but the Liberals would indicate the opposite to me.

The technique is called "push polling" when instead of polling the trend you use the poll to direct the trend.

If the polls come out late today showing the Liberals safely ahead then on Monday I fully expect to see them tossed out on their butts.

But that's just me.


So you are saying the Liberals should be laughing right now? :wink:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Dallas Stars


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 18770
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:18 am
 


Yeah what bart said.

Kind of a side note but what are polls realy for. To tell us how others think? If so does that mean I should change my vote to what someone else wants me to vote for just because in some poll my choice is not in the lead?

It seems more likely that polls are a way to try and influence a persons vote. I dont worry about polls because like bart said earlier in this thread the only poll that counts is the tally from election day.

Stratos


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2928
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:30 am
 


The latest poll has the Tories up 37-28

http://www.sfu.ca/~aheard/elections/polls.html

Except for the occassional poll, the Tories are in the 37-39 range, while the Liberals are in the 27-30. The trends have not been changing the past few weeks.


Offline
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 814
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:36 pm
 


Avro Avro:
Sure, that's why the cons have come out with a liberal platform.

This may be the one thing we agree on. It's why I won't go over the edge supporting the CPC under Harper, the way some folks have gone over the edge supporting the LPC under Martin.

Avro Avro:
No like what lily said plus a tax credit for transit users, and a reduction in consumption tax which btw is not a con move. Plus lets not froget a bunch of other little tax breaks for other special groups instead of the general public.

Are you saying you believe the Liberals will honour any promise they make to reduce the tax burden? If so, keep in mind their current leader is the man, as Chretien's Minister of Finance, who raised federal taxes 31 times in the first 10 years of the current Liberal continuum. At the same time, he cut (reneged on) over $10 biilion/ year in Health and Education transfers to the Provinces. That shifted the federal debt onto the provinces, which caused your provincial taxes to go up, while Martin was also increasing your federal taxes.

Are you happy that, as a Canadian, your Personal Disposable Income (which is a prety good measure of earning power) has decreased by 17% from 1993 to 2005? That's more than the drop in PDI from 1961 - 1992. Have you gotten personal value out of all of the recent tax increases?

As far as I'm concerned, Harpers tax reductions don't go near to "far enough". One of the central credos of conservatism is, "Small government, low taxes" (which is why Clinton was more of a conservative than Reagan,... or either one of the Bush's for that matter). Maybe if Canadians weren't so overtaxed, dual-income household would be able to afford childcare, and neither party would be making insignificant promises to make childcare affordable.

Avro Avro:
Oh so we are bringing that up eh....okay will the Tories end abortion?

Since a Liberal-dominated Senate killed Mulroney's Bill to end abortion (1988 IIRC), more private-members Bills to end abortion have been introduced by Liberal MP's than from any other party. Harper has gone on record as saying (repeatedly) that a CPC government will not introduce any legislation to end legal abortion, nor would they support any private-member's Bill that would attempt to do so. Has Martin made any such promise? If a woman's right to choose is an important issue to you, why would you vote for the Liberal's (btw, when Martin was running for the leadership of the LPC, he said he would consider anti-abortion legislation if that's what the majority of his party indicated they wanted. Contrast that with what Harper has said)?

Avro Avro:
No, it's CUPE.

Are you aware of how many billions Martin took out of several public-service pension funds, claiming they had accrued surpluses and those surpluses could be transferred to general revenues? As a member of the federal public service you, in effect, have paid more than the 'average' Canadian for Martin's pseudo-balanced budgets. That's a double slap-in-your-face insult, considering one of the first things Chretien's government did was to give MP's a healthy raise and plumper pensions just before they froze public sector (including DND) wages for 5 years.

Pension funds are created under a "social contract", by which the beneficiary pays premiums to receive a future benefit. The fund is to be managed in a way that will responsibly accrue wealth to deliver the best benefit to those intended to receive benefit. How then, can a pension fund have a surplus, when it's accrual of wealth is intended to benefit those who paid in (i.e. decrease their premiums or increase their benefits)?

Avro Avro:
No actually I have been trying to meet him because he stated he ahs never met a liberal he couldn't drop so I have called him on it. Now I have voted for several political parties but in recent years lefty ones so I guess I qualify although I hardly class the Liberals as liberal.

Anyways.....when?......where?


Agreed, posting threat in internet forums is pretty childish.

I once had someone threaten me in one forum (devoted to all things Chevy). I posted a picture of myself (6'2" and 250 lbs), mentioned that I played with 500 lb bombs and 600 lb rocket pods when I wasn't humping 165 lb ammo cans and 200 lb boxes of chaff. I then asked him if he'd like to reconsider his threat. His response: "your masquerading as someone you're not". Several months later, I mentioned that my unit would be TDing to his neck of the woods, and would he like to compare who was masquerading. His response: he stopped posting to that internet bbs.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 113 posts ]  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.