Clogeroo Clogeroo:
Still on about that super bowl eh? I bet there are lots of cups out there you have never heard of.
bootlegga is making it sound like only the poor play soccer or if hockey cost the same more would play hockey if not a majority would. So he is implying that soccer is for people who just can't play hockey, which is not really true at all. Like you said you have may the odd kid in there or maybe some parents who sign them up without their interest in it but I doubt this makes the bulk of the players in the sport. Also I bet there are lots of kids who don't want to really play hockey either or have had their parents sign them up for it too. If soccer was an alternative for them you might see more put up their skates if it wasn't for their parents desires.
My point is soccer is a growing sport in Canada and a lot of people play it. Is it to the same national phenomenon as hockey? No but it is still a major sport and many Canadians have an interest in it. I have never actually played hockey in school here other than floor hockey a couple times. In PE it was mostly baseball, kick ball, soccer, and other things. Our school never even had a hockey team but we had a soccer team. There wasn't a football team either but we had rugby. I wasn't brought up around the sport and we don't have pond hockey here so wasn't part of that. Most sport or recreation I'm into is fishing and cycling mostly. I play a game of pool sometimes too. So I'm not the biggest sport fan out there or have ever been on a team but there are more sport in this country other than just hockey. Maybe I'm just sick of hockey and its stereotype in this country that everyone plays it when the majority don't. More people watch it maybe but more people play other sport while less watch them.
Yeah, the Super Bowl isn't anything special...it's just watched by roughly a billion people every year in dozens of countries. Yep, that's pretty inconsequential!
I never said that only poor people play soccer, but I will say that a lot of parents stretch their 'sporting' dollar by having their kids participate in several things over the course of the year, like swimming lessons, soccer, T-ball, etc. I think the $500 sports tax credit the Conservatives will help kids who want to pay hockey. I know if I had children, I wouldn't be able to afford the costs of hockey every year for each child.
Of course that's ORGANIZED hockey. I never actually community league hockey in my life, but have played thousands of hours of hockey in backyard rinks, community league rinks (off-hours), at Rexall Place (sweet ice BTW), etc. My parents couldn't afford to pay the costs for me and my two brothers, but we did have sticks, skates and helmets to play that kind of hockey. Of all the friends I currently play hockey with (played just last weekend BTW), only one played league hockey when he was young.
Like WDHIII, I question your stats. It could very well be that there are more kids playing league soccer than those playing league hockey, but if you add in the grassroots hockey players, I would bet there are far more Canadians playing hockey than playing soccer. There are a dozen soccer fields by my house and they are almost always empty (despite the ethnically diverse neighbourhood I live in) in the summer. In the winter when they flood one for a hockey rink, there are kids out there all night all winter long. Same goes for outdoor rinks around the city. Maybe because Vancouver doesn't get the winter we do in Edmonton it's not as prevalent, but let me tell you in Alberta hockey is played by a lot of people. And I don't know why you never played hockey in PE, but I did in elementary, junior high and senior high. Again, maybe it's because of the lack of outdoor rinks in the lower mainland, I don't know.
Personally, I find it funny that you accused me of having a grudge against soccer when you admit you have one for hockey.