news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

View of Challenging the Greenhouse Effect Speci

Canadian Content
20676news upnews down

View of Challenging the Greenhouse Effect Specification and the Climate Sensitivity of the IPCC


Environmental | 206759 hits | Jan 27 10:21 am | Posted by: uwish
3 Comment

According to the energy laws, it is not possible that the LW absorption of 155.6 Wm-2 by the GH gases could re-emit downward LW radiation of 345.6 Wm-2 on the Earth�s surface

Comments

  1. by Prof_Chomsky
    Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:47 pm
    So to summarize. This paper claims
    "This means that the warming effect of CO2would be between 1.8?C/2 = 0.9?Cor 1.8?C/3 = 0.6?C"

    Which changes what? Assuming this lone paper is accurate, it means CO2 is responsible for half of the observed warming. Meaning other greenhouse gases such as HFC-23, methane etc, all produced through industrial processes that rely on fossil fuels, possibliy cause even more warming.

    So the end effect is, the Earth is still heating at the same rate no matter how you slice it, and CO2 is the primary culprit, even with these calculations.

  2. by avatar CharlesAnthony
    Wed Jan 29, 2020 1:10 am
    You say that like it is a bad thing.

  3. by Prof_Chomsky
    Wed Jan 29, 2020 8:25 pm
    "CharlesAnthony" said
    You say that like it is a bad thing.


    I'd have no problem with a warmer world, if it didn't mean losing every piece of land within 100km of the water, and desertification of much of the remaining tropics.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net