View of Challenging the Greenhouse Effect Specification and the Climate Sensitivity of the IPCCEnvironmental | 180 hits | Jan 27 10:21 am | Posted by: uwish Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile-
Warning: MagpieRSS: Failed to parse RSS file. (Mismatched tag at line 1, column 70) in D:\Hosted Sites\canadaka.net\www\includes\rss_fetch\rss_fetch.inc on line 238
Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\Hosted Sites\canadaka.net\www\themes\text_ads.php on line 21
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2020 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2020 by Canadaka.net
"This means that the warming effect of CO2would be between 1.8?C/2 = 0.9?Cor 1.8?C/3 = 0.6?C"
Which changes what? Assuming this lone paper is accurate, it means CO2 is responsible for half of the observed warming. Meaning other greenhouse gases such as HFC-23, methane etc, all produced through industrial processes that rely on fossil fuels, possibliy cause even more warming.
So the end effect is, the Earth is still heating at the same rate no matter how you slice it, and CO2 is the primary culprit, even with these calculations.
You say that like it is a bad thing.
I'd have no problem with a warmer world, if it didn't mean losing every piece of land within 100km of the water, and desertification of much of the remaining tropics.