CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1530
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:04 pm
 


You would be mistaken Johnny. I have as much interest in calling into one of his shows to debate with him, as I do with you.

Do you happen to notice that I rarely repond to your juvenile one-liners? There is a reason for that :wink:

If you'll notice, there are quite a few individuals here who disagree with my opinions, perspectives and posts... Jaimie, Hwacker, Bart, Eyebrock, Tricks, Mustang1, and Wullu to name a few. The difference though, is that they at times can articulate an argument in such a fashion that inspires me to respond... through a combination of being respectful (at most times), and bringing something in the form of an argument that would suggest to me that they have more than 2 brain cells functioning... which is something that I'm still unsure of about you.

You should take a few notes while reading through these threads, instead of chiming in with your gibberish that smacks of intellectual inadequecy. "pawnage" or "owned" is a term used loosely among those that are unequipped to form an argument in the face of one. Perhaps it's from spending too much of your time in tween chat rooms, and not doing your homework. :wink:

Your "posts"... in these threads are the equivelant to the peanut gallery comments of a dumb kid in a schoolyard who needs to pick a side, and parrots the sentiments of someone who thinks they know what they are talking about, but hasn't the ability to think for himself.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1530
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:37 pm
 


Tricks Tricks:
Calgary123 Calgary123:
The Germans thought it was OK for Hitler to strip away their rights in the name of "security" as well... and poo-hooed all those that apposed it - called them "un-patriotic" and such. It was an incremental process that happened slowly and was eased into the population... much like it has been over the last 5 years.
Oh the wonderful hitler mention. So lets see. Bush has..Taken away everything that jews could do. Bush has declared himself the ruler of Germany for the rest of his natural existence. Bush has become a dictator who kills people who oppose him. You sir, are an idiot if you truely believe these unwarranted hitler comparisons.

$1:
Then the Germans framed Poland with a mock "attack" which was nothing more than german SS dressed as Polish troops... burning down a radio station and staging skirmishes along the border. Hitler brought in martial law, and declared war on Poland based on a these staged attacks...
Uh...That's not how I learned it in history class, or from history text books. Is this another CT theory?

$1:
The stripping of rights is a slippery slope. Hitlers regime used similar tactics to impose these retractions of liberties... calling for a need of security, and being the government "protector" of freedom... propoganda campaigns ie. fear of the communists - the bogeyman, and terrorists.... all the while siezing more and more power that led to Dictatorship, and complete control.
BULLSHIT! Bush has yet to take away any rights, other then flying with liquid objects. Oh the horror. The only thing he has infringed upon the the right to privacy.
$1:
This story has played out once already... It would appear to many that History has a way or repeating itself. :idea:
You are unbelievable. To compare one of the greatest evils of the 1900s to Bush. There is no basis, and you make yourself look like a fool to do so.


$1:
Uh...That's not how I learned it in history class, or from history text books. Is this another CT theory?


You should read "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" by William Shrier. It's 1000 pages and offers a meticulously researched document of this... if you are interested in History like me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rise_a ... hird_Reich

But to be more specific regarding this incident... to save you the trouble of buying the book, which is regarded as an accurate and comprehensive historical account... here is a link. It was called the Gleiwitz incident, and is no CT. It was documented in the Nuremburg trials and stands as accurate to the official account.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident

$1:
BULLSHIT! Bush has yet to take away any rights, other then flying with liquid objects. Oh the horror. The only thing he has infringed upon the the right to privacy.


If you do just a little bit of research on the Patriot Act, I think you'll find much to be concerned with... if you are being critical of it in such a way as to see how this kind of legislation can be abused by the government, at the expense of the American people. I could write a whole thesis on this topic alone, and attach links for days. If you truly only believe that this affects rights to privacy and ones ability to carry on a bottle of gatorade in an airplane... then I can only encourage you to do some research here first, and then I would be happy to address this more indepth with you.

$1:
You are unbelievable. To compare one of the greatest evils of the 1900s to Bush. There is no basis, and you make yourself look like a fool to do so.
[/quote]

Based on your lack of knowledge behind the Polish "invasion" me thinks you might have taken the coles notes version in your History studies regarding this event. No offense, but before you can be critical of my perspective here, you might want to study up on the finer points of the Hitler, WWII era. There are many more mirror images and comparisons that can be drawn than you might think :wink:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25515
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 4:36 am
 


Calgary123 Calgary123:
You should read "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" by William Shrier. It's 1000 pages and offers a meticulously researched document of this... if you are interested in History like me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rise_a ... hird_Reich

But to be more specific regarding this incident... to save you the trouble of buying the book, which is regarded as an accurate and comprehensive historical account... here is a link. It was called the Gleiwitz incident, and is no CT. It was documented in the Nuremburg trials and stands as accurate to the official account.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident
So....How does this compare to Bush again?

$1:
If you do just a little bit of research on the Patriot Act, I think you'll find much to be concerned with...
Bart, Yank-in-NY, Stratos, You guys feel you have had your right infringed upon?
$1:
if you are being critical of it in such a way as to see how this kind of legislation can be abused by the government, at the expense of the American people. I could write a whole thesis on this topic alone, and attach links for days. If you truly only believe that this affects rights to privacy and ones ability to carry on a bottle of gatorade in an airplane... then I can only encourage you to do some research here first, and then I would be happy to address this more indepth with you.
You never provide anything. You only encourage we do our own research. That isn't how it works. Please do provide something.

$1:
Based on your lack of knowledge behind the Polish "invasion" me thinks you might have taken the coles notes version in your History studies regarding this event.
Hardly. My teacher was clearly a douche. He never mentioned it. It was never in my text book.
$1:
No offense, but before you can be critical of my perspective here, you might want to study up on the finer points of the Hitler, WWII era. There are many more mirror images and comparisons that can be drawn than you might think :wink:
No not really. Because if you are trying to draw a line between the Polish invasion, and the 9/11 attack, then you are just being a poo head. ;)


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
 Edmonton Oilers


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1569
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 5:32 am
 


Calgary123 Calgary123:
You would be mistaken Johnny. I have as much interest in calling into one of his shows to debate with him, as I do with you.

Do you happen to notice that I rarely repond to your juvenile one-liners? There is a reason for that :wink:

If you'll notice, there are quite a few individuals here who disagree with my opinions, perspectives and posts... Jaimie, Hwacker, Bart, Eyebrock, Tricks, Mustang1, and Wullu to name a few. The difference though, is that they at times can articulate an argument in such a fashion that inspires me to respond... through a combination of being respectful (at most times), and bringing something in the form of an argument that would suggest to me that they have more than 2 brain cells functioning... which is something that I'm still unsure of about you.

You should take a few notes while reading through these threads, instead of chiming in with your gibberish that smacks of intellectual inadequecy. "pawnage" or "owned" is a term used loosely among those that are unequipped to form an argument in the face of one. Perhaps it's from spending too much of your time in tween chat rooms, and not doing your homework. :wink:

Your "posts"... in these threads are the equivelant to the peanut gallery comments of a dumb kid in a schoolyard who needs to pick a side, and parrots the sentiments of someone who thinks they know what they are talking about, but hasn't the ability to think for himself.

Well professor I can debate, I choose not to with the likes of you because watching you Meltdown with every Anti-American Anti-Bush thread is priceless. You're posts and threads show you for the Conspiracy Theory Tin Foil Hat wearing dumbass you are, the fact Charles Adler pissed you off so much proves me right.. :wink:


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 2282
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 7:35 am
 


Calgary123 wrote: If you do just a little bit of research on the Patriot Act, I think you'll find much to be concerned with... if you are being critical of it in such a way as to see how this kind of legislation can be abused by the government, at the expense of the American people. I could write a whole thesis on this topic alone, and attach links for days. If you truly only believe that this affects rights to privacy and ones ability to carry on a bottle of gatorade in an airplane... then I can only encourage you to do some research here first, and then I would be happy to address this more indepth with you.

Bush went to far with the Patriot act, it stomps all over the rights of Americans. Every time we sit back and allow our governments to enact laws that take away our rights it's another victory for Terrorists. Fund our spy agencies with enough money to do their jobs, and stop picking on the un-washed masses or we the little people.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:15 am
 


Calgary123 Calgary123:
The stripping of rights is a slippery slope.


Indeed, I agree. I have stated my opposition to the Patriot Act so no I wonder if you'll state your opposition to the Gun Registry, the Hate Speech laws, and the myriad other laws in Canada that erode people's freedoms - like the laws concerning Health Canada that your own courts recently said violated the civil rights of Canadians.

Then there's the laws that protect Indians who criminally attack law-abiding people while the police restrain landowners from protecting their persons and their properties.

So before you get all worked up about President Bush attacking freedoms and liberties remember that we still have more freedoms and liberties than you do even with the Patriot Act.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:24 am
 


My own line of thought with the Patriot Act is that it is necessary when the government and the American people are unwilling to deport all of the muslims from the USA and prohibit them from entering as tourists & etc.

We'd be perfectly safe from muslim terrorism if we didn't allow muslims to be here in the first place.

Non-muslims are not permitted to enter many muslim cities so I don't see why we can't treat them the same way they treat us.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1530
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:33 am
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Calgary123 Calgary123:
The stripping of rights is a slippery slope.


Indeed, I agree. I have stated my opposition to the Patriot Act so no I wonder if you'll state your opposition to the Gun Registry, the Hate Speech laws, and the myriad other laws in Canada that erode people's freedoms - like the laws concerning Health Canada that your own courts recently said violated the civil rights of Canadians.

Then there's the laws that protect Indians who criminally attack law-abiding people while the police restrain landowners from protecting their persons and their properties.

So before you get all worked up about President Bush attacking freedoms and liberties remember that we still have more freedoms and liberties than you do even with the Patriot Act.


Indeed,

The gun registry would have been the biggest waste of taxpayers money in our country, and completely useless in achieving it's original purpose. The last piece of news that I read on this went back earlier in the year... I was under the impression that is was in the process of being dismantled. With regards to hate speech laws, and the terror act that our nation has introduced... I would have to agree. It's right on par with the Patriot Act in terms of it's potential to be used in ways that aren't highlighted in its conception.

As far as the Native protections... don't even get me started. My father worked in the federal government (dept. of Indian Affairs) for many years and was involved in much of this. Bloody rediculous if you ask me... in other words, I would agree with you.

I'm not so sure in America, there are "more" freedoms and liberties as you stated... but I will go as far as saying that we need to be vigilant on our soil too. Perhaps part of the reason I'm more inclined to direct my criticism towards the Bush Administration would be based on the impact that they have had on us over the last 5 years - New Terror legislation, ala Patriot Act, Afghanistan, etc. What happens south of our border has a ripple effect on us here.

And besides... he's just too damn of an easy target! :lol:


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1530
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:11 am
 


$1:
Tricks Tricks:
Calgary123 Calgary123:
You should read "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" by William Shrier. It's 1000 pages and offers a meticulously researched document of this... if you are interested in History like me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rise_a ... hird_Reich

But to be more specific regarding this incident... to save you the trouble of buying the book, which is regarded as an accurate and comprehensive historical account... here is a link. It was called the Gleiwitz incident, and is no CT. It was documented in the Nuremburg trials and stands as accurate to the official account.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident
So....How does this compare to Bush again?

$1:
If you do just a little bit of research on the Patriot Act, I think you'll find much to be concerned with...
Bart, Yank-in-NY, Stratos, You guys feel you have had your right infringed upon?
$1:
if you are being critical of it in such a way as to see how this kind of legislation can be abused by the government, at the expense of the American people. I could write a whole thesis on this topic alone, and attach links for days. If you truly only believe that this affects rights to privacy and ones ability to carry on a bottle of gatorade in an airplane... then I can only encourage you to do some research here first, and then I would be happy to address this more indepth with you.
You never provide anything. You only encourage we do our own research. That isn't how it works. Please do provide something.

$1:
So....How does this compare to Bush again?


I was merely reponding to your question, regarding this being a CT, which it isn't. In the context of how this compares to Bush - it was an event used to inspire new security measures and sweeping changes that impacted freedoms and liberties in Germany at the time.

$1:
You only encourage we do our own research. That isn't how it works. Please do provide something.


I need to run out of the office since I have an appointment with my accountant... so I'll start by providing this nice little article/analysis. Try not to be critical, right out of the gate with the source. Read it with an open mind, and then come back with your comments. Note that Alex Jones was one of the first to bring the Patriot Act into the light through his insider information channels, etc.


The Domestic Security Enhancement Act 2003, Also Known as Patriot Act II

By Alex Jones


Congressman Ron Paul (R-Tex) told the Washington Times that no member of Congress was allowed to read the first Patriot Act that was passed by the House on October 27, 2001. The first Patriot Act was universally decried by civil libertarians and Constitutional scholars from across the political spectrum. William Safire, while writing for the New York Times, described the first Patriot Act's powers by saying that President Bush was seizing dictatorial control.

On February 7, 2003 the Center for Public Integrity, a non-partisan public interest think-tank in DC, revealed the full text of the Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003. The classified document had been leaked to them by an unnamed source inside the Federal government. The document consisted of a 33-page section by section analysis of the accompanying 87-page bill.

*Note: On February 10, 2003 I discovered that not only was there a house version that had been covertly brought to Hastert, but that many provisions of the now public Patriot Act II had already been introduced as pork barrel riders on Senate Bill S. 22. Dozens of subsections and even the titles of the subsections are identical to those in the House version. This is very important because it catches the Justice Department in a bald-faced lie. The Justice Department claimed that the secret legislation brought into the House was only for study, and that at this time there was no intention to try and pass it. Now upon reading S. 22, it is clear that the leadership of the Senate is fully aware of the Patriot Act II, and have passed these riders out of their committees into the full bill. I spent two hours scanning through S. 22 and, let me tell you, it is a nightmare for anyone who loves liberty. It even contains the Our Lady of Peace Act that registers all gun owners. It bans the private sale of all firearms, creates a Federal ballistics database, and much more.

There are other bills in the Senate that grant the Federal government sweeping powers. S.45 states in section one that the office for State and local government coordination for Homeland Security will no longer just oversee, but that now local cities critical functions will be headed by a Federal director. On Tuesday, February 11th, we noted a story in The Times-Picayune with the headline: Nagin announces major overhaul of City Hall --New Homeland Security office to oversee cops, firemen, emergency agency. The Federal power-grab taking place is widespread and all Americans must mobilize to resist it.

Another interesting bill is S. 16. S. 16 is a smorgasbord of Federal funding and control over local police departments and needs to be examined closely.

S. 89, The Universal National Service Act of 2003 is the hallmark of an authoritarian society. The description of the bill is, "To provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes." We have looked at some of the programs that the Federal government has already been setting up for service here in the "homeland" and they include East German-style tattletale squads of every type, which are just basically a super TIPS program. The nightmare goes on and on. Check it out for yourself.

The Patriot Act II bill itself is stamped "Confidential -Not for Distribution." Upon reading the analysis and bill, I was stunned by the scientifically crafted tyranny contained in the legislation. The Justice Department Office of Legislative Affairs admits that they had indeed covertly transmitted a copy of the legislation to Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert, (R-Il) and the Vice President of the United States, Dick Cheney as well as the executive heads of federal law enforcement agencies.

It is important to note that no member of Congress was allowed to see the first Patriot Act before its passage, and that no debate was tolerate by the House and Senate leadership. The intentions of the White House and Speaker Hastert concerning Patriot Act II appear to be a carbon copy replay of the events that led to the unprecedented passage of the first Patriot Act.
There are two glaring areas that need to be looked at concerning this new legislation:

1. The secretive tactics being used by the White House and Speaker Hastert to keep even the existence of this legislation secret would be more at home in Communist China than in the United States. The fact that Cheney publicly managed the steamroller passage of the first Patriot Act, insuring that no one was allowed to read it and publicly threatening members of Congress that if they didn’t vote in favor of it that they would be blamed for the next terrorist attack, is by the White House’s own definition terrorism. The move to clandestinely craft and then bully passage of any legislation by the Executive Branch is clearly an impeachable offence.

2. The second Patriot Act is a mirror image of powers that Julius Caesar and Adolf Hitler gave themselves. Whereas the First Patriot Act only gutted the First, Third, Fourth and Fifth Amendments, and seriously damaged the Seventh and the Tenth, the Second Patriot Act reorganizes the entire Federal government as well as many areas of state government under the dictatorial control of the Justice Department, the Office of Homeland Security and the FEMA NORTHCOM military command. The Domestic Security Enhancement Act 2003, also known as the Second Patriot Act is by its very structure the definition of dictatorship.

I challenge all Americans to study the new Patriot Act and to compare it to the Constitution, Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence. Ninety percent of the act has nothing to do with terrorism and is instead a giant Federal power-grab with tentacles reaching into every facet of our society. It strips American citizens of all of their rights and grants the government and its private agents total immunity.

Here is a quick thumbnail sketch of just some of the draconian measures encapsulated within this tyrannical legislation:

SECTION 501 (Expatriation of Terrorists) expands the Bush administration’s “enemy combatant” definition to all American citizens who “may” have violated any provision of Section 802 of the first Patriot Act. (Section 802 is the new definition of domestic terrorism, and the definition is “any action that endangers human life that is a violation of any Federal or State law.”) Section 501 of the second Patriot Act directly connects to Section 125 of the same act. The Justice Department boldly claims that the incredibly broad Section 802 of the First USA Patriot Act isn’t broad enough and that a new, unlimited definition of terrorism is needed.

Under Section 501 a US citizen engaging in lawful activities can be grabbed off the street and thrown into a van never to be seen again. The Justice Department states that they can do this because the person “had inferred from conduct” that they were not a US citizen.

Remember Section 802 of the First USA Patriot Act states that any violation of Federal or State law can result in the “enemy combatant” terrorist designation.

SECTION 201 of the second Patriot Act makes it a criminal act for any member of the government or any citizen to release any information concerning the incarceration or whereabouts of detainees. It also states that law enforcement does not even have to tell the press who they have arrested and they never have to release the names.

SECTION 301 and 306 (Terrorist Identification Database) set up a national database of “suspected terrorists” and radically expand the database to include anyone associated with suspected terrorist groups and anyone involved in crimes or having supported any group designated as “terrorist.” These sections also set up a national DNA database for anyone on probation or who has been on probation for any crime, pg3
and orders State governments to collect the DNA for the Federal government.

SECTION 312 gives immunity to law enforcement engaging in spying operations against the American people and would place substantial restrictions on on court injunctions against Federal violations of civil rights across the board.

SECTION 101 will designate individual terrorists as foreign powers and again strip them of all rights under the “enemy combatant” designation.

SECTION 102 states clearly that any information gathering, regardless of whether or not those activities are illegal, can be considered to be clandestine intelligence activities for a foreign power. This makes news gathering illegal.

SECTION 103 allows the Federal government to use wartime martial law powers domestically and internationally without Congress declaring that a state of war exists.

SECTION 106 is bone-chilling in its straightforwardness. It states that broad general warrants by the secret FSIA court (a panel of secret judges set up in a star chamber system that convenes in an undisclosed location) granted under the first Patriot Act are not good enough.

It states that government agents must be given immunity for carrying out searches with no prior court approval. This section throws out the entire Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures.

SECTION 109 allows secret star chamber courts to issue contempt charges against any individual or corporation who refuses to incriminate themselves or others. This sections annihilate the last vestiges of the Fifth Amendment.

SECTION 110 restates that key police state clauses in the first Patriot Act were not sunsetted and removes the five year sunset clause from other subsections of the first Patriot Act. After all, the media has told us: “this is the New America. Get used to it. This is forever.”

SECTION 111 expands the definition of the “enemy combatant” designation.

SECTION 122 restates the government’s newly announced power of “surveillance without a court order.”

SECTION 123 restates that the government no longer needs warrants and that the investigations can be a giant dragnet-style sweep described in press reports about the Total Information Awareness Network. One passage reads, “thus the focus of domestic surveillance may be less precise than that directed against more conventional types of crime.”

*Note: Over and over again, in subsection after subsection, the second Patriot Act states that its new Soviet-type powers will be used to fight international terrorism, domestic terrorism and other types of crimes. Of course the government has already announced in Section 802 of the first USA Patriot act that any crime is considered domestic terrorism.

SECTION 126 grants the government the right to mine the entire spectrum of public and private sector information from bank records to educational and medical records. This is the enacting law to allow ECHELON and the Total Information Awareness Network to totally break down any and all walls of privacy.

The government states that they must look at everything to “determine” if individuals or groups might have a connection to terrorist groups. As you can now see, you are guilty until proven innocent.

SECTION 127 allows the government to takeover coroners’ and medical examiners’ operations whenever they see fit. See how this is like Bill Clinton’s special medical examiner he had in Arkansas that ruled that people had committed suicide when their arms and legs had been cut off.

SECTION 128 allows the Federal government to place gag orders on Federal and State Grand Juries and to take over the proceedings. It also disallows individuals or organizations to even try to quash a Federal subpoena. So now defending yourself will be a terrorist action.

pg4
SECTION 129 destroys any remaining whistleblower protection for Federal agents.

SECTION 202 allows corporations to keep secret their activities with toxic biological, chemical or radiological materials.

SECTION 205 allows top Federal officials to keep all their financial dealings secret, and anyone investigating them can be considered a terrorist. This should be very useful for Dick Cheney to stop anyone investigating Halliburton.

SECTION 303 sets up national DNA database of suspected terrorists. The database will also be used to “stop other unlawful activities.” It will share the information with state, local and foreign agencies for the same purposes.

SECTION 311 federalizes your local police department in the area of information sharing.

SECTION 313 provides liability protection for businesses, especially big businesses that spy on their customers for Homeland Security, violating their privacy agreements. It goes on to say that these are all preventative measures – has anyone seen Minority Report? This is the access hub for the Total Information Awareness Network.

SECTION 321 authorizes foreign governments to spy on the American people and to share information with foreign governments.

SECTION 322 removes Congress from the extradition process and allows officers of the Homeland Security complex to extradite American citizens anywhere they wish. It also allows Homeland Security to secretly take individuals out of foreign countries.

SECTION 402 is titled “Providing Material Support to Terrorism.” The section reads that there is no requirement to show that the individual even had the intent to aid terrorists.

SECTION 403 expands the definition of weapons of mass destruction to include any activity that affects interstate or foreign commerce.

SECTION 404 makes it a crime for a terrorist or “other criminals” to use encryption in the commission of a crime.

SECTION 408 creates “lifetime parole” (basically, slavery) for a whole host of crimes.

SECTION 410 creates no statute of limitations for anyone that engages in terrorist actions or supports terrorists. Remember: any crime is now considered terrorism under the first Patriot Act.

SECTION 411 expands crimes that are punishable by death. Again, they point to Section 802 of the first Patriot Act and state that any terrorist act or support of terrorist act can result in the death penalty.

SECTION 421 increases penalties for terrorist financing.

This section states that any type of financial activity connected to terrorism will result to time in prison and $10-50,000 fines per violation.

SECTIONS 427 sets up asset forfeiture provisions for anyone engaging in terrorist activities.

There are many other sections that I did not cover in the interest of time. The American people were shocked by the despotic nature of the first Patriot Act. The second Patriot Act dwarfs all police state legislation in modern world history.

Usually, corrupt governments allow their citizens lots of wonderful rights on paper, while carrying out their jackbooted oppression covertly. From snatch and grab operations to warantless searches, Patriot Act II is an Adolf Hitler wish list.

You can understand why President Bush, Dick Cheney and Dennis Hastert want to keep this legislation secret not just from Congress, but the American people as well. Bill Allison, Managing Editor of the Center for Public Integrity, the group that broke this story, stated on my radio show that it was obvious that they were just waiting for another terrorist attack to opportunistically get this new bill through. He then shocked me with an insightful comment about how the Federal government was crafting this so that they could go after the American people in general. He also

pg5
agreed that the FBI has been quietly demonizing patriots and Christians and “those who carry around pocket Constitutions.”

I have produced two documentary films and written a book about what really happened on September 11th. The bottom line is this: the military-industrial complex carried the attacks out as a pretext for control. Anyone who doubts this just hasn’t looked at the mountains of hard evidence.

Of course, the current group of white collar criminals in the White House might not care that we’re finding out the details of their next phase. Because, after all, when smallpox gets released, or more buildings start blowing up, the President can stand up there at his lectern suppressing a smirk, squeeze out a tear or two, and tell us that “See I was right. I had to take away your rights to keep you safe. And now it’s your fault that all of these children are dead.” From that point on, anyone who criticizes tyranny will be shouted down by the paid talking head government mouthpieces in the mainstream media.

You have to admit, it’s a beautiful script. Unfortunately, it’s being played out in the real world. If we don’t get the word out that government is using terror to control our lives while doing nothing to stop the terrorists, we will deserve what we get - tyranny. But our children won’t deserve it.
quote]


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21665
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:19 am
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
We'd be perfectly safe ...


For me, that would be a fate worse than death.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:13 am
 


Zipperfish Zipperfish:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
We'd be perfectly safe ...


For me, that would be a fate worse than death.


Why would subjecting muslims to the same rules in our countries that they subject us to in theirs pose any difficulty to you at all?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20460
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:27 am
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
We'd be perfectly safe ...


For me, that would be a fate worse than death.


Why would subjecting muslims to the same rules in our countries that they subject us to in theirs pose any difficulty to you at all?


None. Any country that has restrictive laws that disallows citizens of another faith from entering deserve to have its citizens subjected to the same conditions.

Every country has the inalienable right to deny entry to anyone it feels may be a security risk.

We aren't obligated to allow them entry into our respective countries.

On a related sidenote: The US has been making noises about demanding security checks and passenger manifests for CDN airliners flying through US airspace but not landing in the US, ie a flight from T.O to Nova Scotia.

Do you think thats fair?

If so do you feel that Canada has the right to demand the same curtesy for all ships traversing its territory on the St. Lawrence despite it being an international waterway?

Just curious.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1104
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:41 am
 


DerbyX DerbyX:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
We'd be perfectly safe ...


For me, that would be a fate worse than death.


Why would subjecting muslims to the same rules in our countries that they subject us to in theirs pose any difficulty to you at all?


None. Any country that has restrictive laws that disallows citizens of another faith from entering deserve to have its citizens subjected to the same conditions.

Every country has the inalienable right to deny entry to anyone it feels may be a security risk.

We aren't obligated to allow them entry into our respective countries.




Which of their laws should we then adopt? Why stop at entry laws and why only "tit for tat?" Shall we refuse entry to Zoroastrians? Buddhists? Atheists? Which religion(s)s/are allowable?
Our laws must be compatible with our values, our rights and our principles

I'm no more ready to see our laws echo theirs on entry and religion then I am ready to reintroduce public hangings or floggings.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20460
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:50 am
 


Firecat Firecat:
Which of their laws should we then adopt? Why stop at entry laws and why only "tit for tat?" Shall we refuse entry to Zoroastrians? Buddhists? Atheists? Which religion(s)s/are allowable?
Our laws must be compatible with our values, our rights and our principles

I'm no more ready to see our laws echo theirs on entry and religion then I am ready to reintroduce public hangings or floggings.


I believe that my position was clear and reasonable. We aren't "adopting their laws". All we would be doing is quid pro quo with regards to their entry visa restrictions.

"tit for tat" perhaps but why should we extend rights to their citzens if they don't extend to ours?

It isn't about religion but about fair play. Thats a far cry from "being as bad as they are argument".

In addition, Canada already extends different visa restrictions based on various factors.

Other countries do the same. When I visited England & Australia I needed to obtain a visa. The visas I needed were both easier to get and had less restrictions then a US citizen had to get simply because were were all commonwealth countries.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 10896
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:57 am
 


Visiting England & Australia needs no visa.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 202 posts ]  Previous  1 ... 6  7  8  9  10  11  12 ... 14  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest



cron
 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.