CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1205
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:30 pm
 


Probably cause the towers were about 100x larger than the planes? Or cause a skyscraper has never came crashig down to the ground like that before that day.

Im not saying they are good reasons. Just possible reasons why.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25515
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:31 pm
 


SireJoe SireJoe:
Probably cause the towers were about 100x larger than the planes? Or cause a skyscraper has never came crashig down to the ground like that before that day.

Im not saying they are good reasons. Just possible reasons why.
Size has no bearing at all. Also, when was the last time a skyscraper was ran into by a boeing 747 going really fuckin fast?


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1205
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:36 pm
 


Whether size has bearing or not isnt the point. Its the way things appear or sound. Its like a fly running into you at full speed....or at least thats the way it would appear. Its like 10,000 lbs against 1,000,000 lbs. Its just hard to fathom something so big coming down so fast from a fookin plane.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25515
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:42 pm
 


SireJoe SireJoe:
Whether size has bearing or not isnt the point. Its the way things appear or sound. Its like a fly running into you at full speed....or at least thats the way it would appear. Its like 10,000 lbs against 1,000,000 lbs. Its just hard to fathom something so big coming down so fast from a fookin plane.
When a fly runs into us, it doesn't go into us and explode taking out a bunch of supports either. Size has no meaning if it take out supports. Combined with the fire. It's not hard the grasp. It is like a bomb actually. Bombs are smaller then a plane and they take out buildings, so why can't a plane?


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1205
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:44 pm
 


I guess you just cant see it from other peoples angle. Im simply giving an example of how some people could view the tower coming down as "suspicious" thats all. Whether you agree with it, or understand it, is completely besides the point.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25515
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:46 pm
 


SireJoe SireJoe:
I guess you just cant see it from other peoples angle. Im simply giving an example of how some people could view the tower coming down as "suspicious" thats all. Whether you agree with it, or understand it, is completely besides the point.
What other angle? It is completely ludicrous any other way. By your analogy the plane should have bounced off the building and flown away.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14063
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:51 pm
 


SireJoe SireJoe:
Its just hard to fathom something so big coming down so fast from a fookin plane.
When you find something hard to understand, it's best not to assume you understand it at all.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1205
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:55 pm
 


Nor have I. I am no engineer. Or any type of expert on the situation. I dont beleive one way or the other on the whole ordeal.

But to tricks. No. I never said anything about a bouncy plane. Try again.

But obviously your comprehension of how others think is lacking. So no further comment need be made.


Offline
Newbie
Newbie
Profile
Posts: 16
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 11:42 pm
 


Only the conspiracy theorists can come up with crap claiming that the building should not have come down because of the planes, the massive weight and size caused by a failing structure...


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25515
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 6:51 am
 


SireJoe SireJoe:
But to tricks. No. I never said anything about a bouncy plane. Try again.
Well you said thaat we don't fall down when a fly runs into us right? A fly bounces off and flies away. So if you are using that analogy, then clearly the plane should bounce off to? Or are you going to admit that analogy was retarded.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1104
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:05 am
 


SireJoe SireJoe:
Whether size has bearing or not isnt the point. Its the way things appear or sound. Its like a fly running into you at full speed....or at least thats the way it would appear. Its like 10,000 lbs against 1,000,000 lbs. Its just hard to fathom something so big coming down so fast from a fookin plane.


What about a bullet hitting someone. Mass and velocity combine to make a lot of force. Compound that with the bullet exploding into a ball of fire on impact.

Conspiracy theory is a seemingly solely American characteristic. The conceit of the fiercely independent individual manifests itself in unmatched distrust in their government.
There is a willingness to believe the most elaborate explanations and belief in secrets held from public view, somehow guarded with a discretion and efficacy foreign to our nature - the crueller and more nefarious and offensive to God and Man the better.

Knowledge and Secularism relegates the concept of the literal Satan to comic books and movies so the "modern civilized mind" creates a new unseen "Satan" in the securely guarded and inaccessible offices and mysterious places from which Power is wielded.

One can never convince a CT to give up their faith.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21665
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:12 am
 


SireJoe SireJoe:
Probably cause the towers were about 100x larger than the planes? Or cause a skyscraper has never came crashig down to the ground like that before that day.

Im not saying they are good reasons. Just possible reasons why.


Has it occurred to you that a large airlliner loaded wiht several tonnes of falmmable liquid hitting the building at several hundredmiles an hour might be the cause. Doesn't that seem more likely than a bunch of people sneaking into a building inhabited by thousands of people and loading explosives at strategic points on several floors and then detonating them (how?) wihtout anyone inside noticing.

Occam's razo5r and all that.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 2282
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:20 am
 


Why is it so difficult for some to just except that Arab Muslims flew the planes into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon? They have publicly denounced us as infidels and the Radicals scream and rant about the evils of the "West" and yet some would prefer to believe that the U.S. master-minded these terrible deeds. Sorry but it's twisted thinking to the extreme.

Today I heard on the Radio that Muslims in Israel burned down two churches, A Church of England and a Catholic Church. Is this another example of "Bush made them do it?" No wait the Pope is in Rome, oh well I'm sure it's Bush's fault for the Deeds of the Filty Animals that burned two churchs, Islam a religion of peace.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4805
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:51 am
 


This paper blows a big hole through the demolition theory.

It was created by demolition industry experts.

You have the choice of believing the CTs and their "expert" opinion on demolitions who have never handled a stick of dynamite in their whole lives or experts who deal with demolition every day of their lives.

Your choice.


Last edited by Bodah on Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4805
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:03 am
 


Scrappy Scrappy:
Why is it so difficult for some to just except that Arab Muslims flew the planes into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon? They have publicly denounced us as infidels and the Radicals scream and rant about the evils of the "West" and yet some would prefer to believe that the U.S. master-minded these terrible deeds. Sorry but it's twisted thinking to the extreme.


A couple of reasons I think, I believe a part of the population of western civilization are currently going through a period of self-loathing. Western Civilization is the best in the world currently and some people feel ashamed because of it, they feel like in order to get where were at we must of fucked over some other countries to get there in the past. And its just a matter of time before someone fucks us over = 911.

The other reason I think some people have a hard time accepting that in certain parts of the world people hate us, not only just hate us. But would kill us in a second if they could. They have a hard time accepting that earth isn't a friendly place for all of us.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 202 posts ]  Previous  1 ... 8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests



cron
 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.