ridenrain ridenrain:
So far the only ones I see who want an election are Liberal war room hacks like Cat Meat Kinsella and assorted other Liberal pundits who see that Iggy is fast going down the Dion road. No Trudeaupia for you!
Even in the secret bathroom confessions that are all the vogue these days, there's talk of Iggy being told what to do by the Canadian bankers who actually run the Liberal party.
Bring it on.
( yeah no one seems to really want one but the liberal hacks , there was this good editorial in the hamilton spectator today , it looks like even the media doesn't want one or buying into the oppositions reasons, not to mention that layton and duceppe will look like fools if they really try and force an unwanted election without even reading the report harper put out )
Lame excuse for an election
June 13, 2009
Robert Howard
The Hamilton Spectator
(Jun 13, 2009)
We've said it before in this space, more than once. We'll likely say it again. But once more into the breach: No election. Not now.
The Conservative economic update -- regardless of how much positive and negative spin envelops it -- is a lame excuse for an election.
An election in the midst of a generation-defining recession and a national economy in tatters is not about good governance or responsible opposition. It's about opportunism and grasping for power.
Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff appears to be the pivotal figure to decide if Canadians will go to the polls within months for the third general election in less than four years. At press time, he had not announced whether his party would vote against the Conservative government's economic update.
As for the economic update: It's all about who you believe. The government claims success because more than 80 per cent of the $35 billion stimulus program has been allocated and "is being implemented." The opposition says the government is failing because cheques aren't flowing to municipalities and jobs aren't being created.
(Let us note here that if 20 per cent of $35 billion is not allocated, both McMaster University and Mohawk College are deserving of a fairer share than they've got so far.)
But the current brinksmanship in Ottawa is not about the stimulus funds. It's about survey results and windows of opportunity. Ignatieff is buoyed by poll numbers showing the Liberals slightly ahead of the Conservatives nationally and strongly ahead in the crucial GTA/905 battleground. And the Liberals are worried they may not get another chance to force an election before the economy starts to recover, which could boost Conservative fortunes.
Jack Layton's New Democrats and Gilles Duceppe's Bloc Quebecois have said -- without looking at the Harper government's economic update document -- that they will vote against it. That puts only the Liberals between the current government and a summer election.
But there's many a slip 'twixt the cup and the lip, or in this case between media scrums and toppling the government: Each opposition party has its own agenda, issues and concerns. Should Ignatieff announce he will not support the update, no one should be surprised if the NDP or BQ wring a minor but face-saving concession out of the Conservatives to avoid an election that could cost them more, in seats and even leadership, than they will publicly admit.
The fact is that an election any time soon should cost all four parties: Canadians have indicated over and over again they don't want to go to the polls again now. The last two elections each cost taxpayers more than $300 million -- a 2008 vote would put the cumulative cost of political game-playing at close to $1 billion.
It used to be that minority parliaments produced progressive legislation: This one is about jockeying for position and power.
We'll keep saying it until the games stop: Canadians need leadership, not another election
http://www.thespec.com/Opinions/article/582909