[romanP]

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

romanP romanP:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

There's a difference between DerbyX sitting on his comfy couch smoking a joint,

and, a hardened drug dealer that shoots his competitors, and rapes his women all in the name of drugs and profit.....The drug dealer does his own dirty work.

DerbyX, just because your joint comes out of a cellophane bag, doesn't mean that you are on higher moral ground.

Most pot dealers aren't involved in violent crime. At least, none of the ones I've ever met.

and thats the answer I expect from anyone that is asked.

Why do you find that funny? You accused pot dealers of being violent, and I can tell you from experience that they're largely not. Have you ever even met a pot dealer?

[Mustang1]

ridenrain ridenrain:

That's funny.
By master debator rules, the last person who comments wins and it looks like Mtbr got that one.

Nope...master debator rules eschew little whiny sucks that make immaterial insults FIRST and then bitch the minute it's thrown back in their stunned faces. You're one of the biggest intellectual cowards here, Xerox, so you're cheerleading means little

$1:

Demo-Derby even feels so sorry that he has to root for his favorite side.

So says Ridendumb the hypocrite as he stumbles in with his sucky cheerleading

$1:

Net result is there are no examples of pot being taxed effectively anywhere else, and because pot grown in Canada is destined for the states, it won't make any difference anyways.

Who cares? It will become legalized or decriminalized, comrade, but thanks for pushing your antiquated Puritanical crap on us. Sorry, the minute i start taking orders from lowlifes like is the minute mtbr shows up for his bike whooping from WDHIII

Back to your partisan Xeroxing, joke.

[romanP]

CommanderSock CommanderSock:

$1:

Most of that is about cocaine and heroin. I believe any drug that is addictive should be banned. Can't prove the addictiveness...legalize it.

Coffee withdrawal doesn't cause shakes, hallucinations, nausea, urge to break into someone's house and take things to sell to fuel the addiction.

So, shitty recovery symptoms are a reason to make things illegal?

Throw alcohol back into the pot, then. Oh wait, that didn't work the first time. What makes you think it'll work again?

Also, it should be illegal to have the flu.

Very few people who use pot, tobacco, alcohol, MDMA, shrooms, LSD, dextromethorphan (that's the active ingredient in most cough syrups), nitrous oxide, GHB, morning glory seeds (they produce LSA, which gives a very acid-like high, since it is virtually the same chemical), or salvia divinorum will be likely to rob people to keep doing more because they don't produce the kind of need for more that drugs like coke and heroin do. Only about half of those plants and substances are legal.

[ridenrain]

Mustang1 Mustang1:

$1:

Net result is there are no examples of pot being taxed effectively anywhere else, and because pot grown in Canada is destined for the states, it won't make any difference anyways.

Who cares? It will become legalized or decriminalized, comrade, but thanks for pushing your antiquated Puritanical crap on us. Sorry, the minute i start taking orders from lowlifes like is the minute mtbr shows up for his bike whooping from WDHIII

Back to your partisan Xeroxing, joke.

Name calling, name calling and insults. Big talker. You bitch at others for being on topic and then when I go back onto topic, you deride it further.

I return to the topic again.
Has pot been taxed anywhere successfully?

[Mustang1]

ridenrain ridenrain:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

$1:

Net result is there are no examples of pot being taxed effectively anywhere else, and because pot grown in Canada is destined for the states, it won't make any difference anyways.

Who cares? It will become legalized or decriminalized, comrade, but thanks for pushing your antiquated Puritanical crap on us. Sorry, the minute i start taking orders from lowlifes like is the minute mtbr shows up for his bike whooping from WDHIII

Back to your partisan Xeroxing, joke.

Name calling, name calling and insults. Big talker.

You just chastised me for name-calling by calling me a name?!?!? Brilliant.

$1:

You bitch at others for being on topic and then when I go back onto topic, you deride it further.

And you only singled out me, cheerleader, by posting immaterial crap. I posted on the topic, but then, that would require you to possess rudimentary reading comprehension, wouldn't it?

$1:

I return to the topic again.
Has pot been taxed anywhere successfully?

Argumentative fallacy. Who cares? We can be the first. In fact, instead of aping someone else's story, as per usual, why not actually offer up some suggestions. Instead of being an automaton, let's see some original application of knowledge. In fact, wouldn't your 'borrowed' argument support the legalization or decriminalization of marijuana? Don't believe me? Look up Prohibition.

[DerbyX]

Mustang1 Mustang1:

ridenrain ridenrain:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

$1:

Net result is there are no examples of pot being taxed effectively anywhere else, and because pot grown in Canada is destined for the states, it won't make any difference anyways.

Who cares? It will become legalized or decriminalized, comrade, but thanks for pushing your antiquated Puritanical crap on us. Sorry, the minute i start taking orders from lowlifes like is the minute mtbr shows up for his bike whooping from WDHIII

Back to your partisan Xeroxing, joke.

Name calling, name calling and insults. Big talker.

You just chastised me for name-calling by calling me a name?!?!? Brilliant.

$1:

You bitch at others for being on topic and then when I go back onto topic, you deride it further.

And you only singled out me, cheerleader, by posting immaterial crap. I posted on the topic, but then, that would require you to possess rudimentary reading comprehension, wouldn't it?

$1:

I return to the topic again.
Has pot been taxed anywhere successfully?

Argumentative fallacy. Who cares? We can be the first. In fact, instead of aping someone else's story, as per usual, why not actually offer up some suggestions. Instead of being an automaton, let's see some original application of knowledge. In fact, wouldn't your 'borrowed' argument support the legalization or decriminalization of marijuana? Don't believe me? Look up Prohibition.

While he looks up prohibition he should read up on hypocracy.

Crying about Liberals playing partisan games by questioning past relationships of a Tory at the same time he starts a thread insinuating that a Liberals health problem is actually a smokescreen for "jumping ship" (amazing how the burden of proof they demanded over the Cadman affair vanished in place of their wild accusations eh?) seems to hint that we may very well see his picture (horses ass avatar natch) below the word ala Homer - lucky.

[hwacker]

Sure the liberals want it legal so they donate some more of our money to pot rehab centers.

[Zipperfish]

hwacker hwacker:

Sure the liberals want it legal so they donate some more of our money to pot rehab centers.

Either that or it's because we like freedom.

[Ripcat]

hwacker hwacker:

Sure the liberals want it legal so they donate some more of our money to pot rehab centers.

That's got to be better than conservatives spending our money to take their biker-chick girlfiends on working vacations.

[hwacker]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

hwacker hwacker:

Sure the liberals want it legal so they donate some more of our money to pot rehab centers.

Either that or it's because we like freedom.

Well put your efforts behind stopping the liberal designed CHRC then.

[Zipperfish]

hwacker hwacker:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

hwacker hwacker:

Sure the liberals want it legal so they donate some more of our money to pot rehab centers.

Either that or it's because we like freedom.

Well put your efforts behind stopping the liberal designed CHRC then.

I already have.

[Public_Domain]

[hwacker]

Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:

I find it funny that the Anti-Pot crowd is trying to use the Charter here.

Just because it doesn't say "The right to smoke marijuana" doesn't mean anything.

Infact, Technically speaking, you don't have the RIGHT to EAT. You don't have the RIGHT to have a HOME. You don't have a RIGHT to live HAPPILY.

Don't point at the damn Charter, it really doesn't fit in this argument.

yep thanks PET you POS

[Public_Domain]

[DerbyX]

Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:

hwacker hwacker:

Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:

I find it funny that the Anti-Pot crowd is trying to use the Charter here.

Just because it doesn't say "The right to smoke marijuana" doesn't mean anything.

Infact, Technically speaking, you don't have the RIGHT to EAT. You don't have the RIGHT to have a HOME. You don't have a RIGHT to live HAPPILY.

Don't point at the damn Charter, it really doesn't fit in this argument.

yep thanks PET you POS

hwacker... Shut the fuck up, you pathetic waste of opinion.

Yes he is. Despite your flaws concerning your opinion of the US (which I attribute more to youth then anything) you have already surpassed hwanker in every measurable sense concerning intelligence, maturity, sophistication, and every other style word you can think of. The scary part is that specimen purports to be a family man and father. A stronger argument for controlled procreation if ever I heard one.

A word of caution. Look at him and strive to not be like him. Dispensing with an all-consuming hate of the US is step one.

(step 2 is bathing regularily which you may already do).