Lemmy Lemmy:
If the ridership is so low, then why are AC and Luftansa refusing to allow Air Emirates to provide the direct flight? The blackmailing is being done by AC and Luftansa. And they're the ones running for the government to step in on their behalf. Air Emirates is just reacting to a couple of inefficient crybaby corporations that can't compete on a level playing field.
Well, given that AC doesn't fly to UAE, I don't see them caring about the flight to UAE. If Lufthansa wants to maintain a profitable flight (that's my guess anyways) - that's a separate issue. Canada has nothing to do with that directly.
AC's concern is probably for limited slots in an already crowded Pearson airport. Why allow a direct flight for something with low ridership once/twice per week when it can be used by another airline (AC, Westjet, or even an international carrier) that goes to a busier destination and carries more people back and forth? It makes sense to me. If, as airport manager/transport minister/etc, I was forced to choose between a direct flight to UAE once per week or a daily flight to the Caribbean, I'd choose the Caribbean flight over the UAE.
It's a simple business matter of numbers and profitability.
But like I said, the second the UAE government threatened our use of a base over a business issue, it changed the dynamic of the entire situation.
For years Canada wanted a 'favored tourism destination' classification from China. What did our government do? They negotiated and got it. They didn't suddenly change the visa requirement rules for Chinese citizens (and only Chinese citizens) or suddenly not allow Chinese companies to use our sea/air space.
That's where the UAE blew it.
Had they negotiated and had some patience, I've no doubt that eventually they would have gotten what they wanted. Instead, they acted like children and so were told to go sit in the corner.
I quite often don't like what the Harper government does, but in this case, they made the correct decision if you ask me.