Goober911 Goober911:
Delwin Delwin:
Im not completely sure what you think the difference is between West bank and gaza but when the IDF has info they act on it.
Hamas Attacks Soldiers as IDF Destroys Two Gaza Terror Tunnels
http://www.idfblog.com/blog/2013/11/01/ ... r-tunnels/VIDEO: IDF RAID ON SHIP CARRYING MISSILES BOUND FOR GAZA
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014 ... d-For-GazaNope. Going into Gaza by land raises the number of innocents killed. Look to the last time it occurred.
They had a ceasefire and Israel was not looking to break this after what was a feeble attempt at a peace deal fell apart.
Then the PL makes an agreement, political with Hamas.
Israel had no reason to go into Gaza.
Hamas is isolated and broke. Egypt cut them off.
The above is what I wrote. My references were to land only. I know they use air power.
And why is that. High causality rates on both sides.
So where I lied is beyond me.
And I am not interested in getting into any pissing contest, I may make an exception for that Wack Job Monty 16.
I know they weren't going to go into Gaza on foot. My point is that you are trying to imply that they have Intel on 1000 legitimate terrorist targets, and not only did they not act on them, but they released no information, even up to this point, that they even existed. I am saying that that premise seems highly unlikely, because as you had said, they have the ability to strike by air or by sea, as they have. Yet they selected on a couple to act on, just 8 months ago ?
They use this information on the ground crap to justify further escalation and to explain away the deaths of the children and women without offering up proof. Proof would obviously give them stronger support for the offensive.