|
Author |
Topic Options
|
Posts: 9956
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:15 pm
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776: Tman1 Tman1: TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776: Tman1 Tman1: TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776: Tman1 Tman1: Its called Istanbul. Christians weren't willing to fight for it, they lost it fair and square. Nuff said. Oh, I'd say they were very willing to fight for it for well over a thousand years. The West just got caught up in their own internal battles when the Ottomans rose to power. (The Schism didn't help much either) Thats why they relied on the Venetians, who conquered it 300 years before to defend it? The population at the time was around 100,000 I think. Not exactly the pinnicle of Christianity anymore I would say. The Fourth Crusade was messed up. Anyway, up to the last day the Christian inhabitants gave it their all- even if they were lead by a Genoan. Oh no Im not denying they didnt give it their all in fact I am amazed they survived long enough to an enemy 5 times their number. If fact, I think there was a problem with the chain of command or something, and Mehemed took advantage of that and made one last siege and there you go. What I am wondering is why the Christians didnt bolster the population more. England and France had the 100 years war right? What the hell were Germany and the rest of Europe doing? The Hussites, Swiss, and Poles were all busy invading Germany, Bohemia, Austria and the Teutonic Kingdoms. Europe was all tied up- the Black Death didn't help either.
Forgot about the plague. 
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:10 am
Isn't Istanbul just Turkisk for "the City"? I have some Turkish friends who say most Turks still refer to it as Costantinople. Besides which Mumbai - Bombay, Malvinas - Falklands, it's all a matter of semantics.
|
GreatBriton
CKA Elite
Posts: 3152
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:20 am
Constantinople is what the city used to be called. It's now definetely Istanbul.
For English-speakers, they are only called the Falkland Islands. "Malvinas" is the Spanish term for the islands. That's what the Argies, who wrongly claim that Argentina should belong to them, call the Falklands.
|
GreatBriton
CKA Elite
Posts: 3152
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:23 am
Tman1 Tman1: TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776: Tman1 Tman1: TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776: Tman1 Tman1: Its called Istanbul. Christians weren't willing to fight for it, they lost it fair and square. Nuff said. Oh, I'd say they were very willing to fight for it for well over a thousand years. The West just got caught up in their own internal battles when the Ottomans rose to power. (The Schism didn't help much either) Thats why they relied on the Venetians, who conquered it 300 years before to defend it? The population at the time was around 100,000 I think. Not exactly the pinnicle of Christianity anymore I would say. The Fourth Crusade was messed up. Anyway, up to the last day the Christian inhabitants gave it their all- even if they were lead by a Genoan. Oh no Im not denying they didnt give it their all in fact I am amazed they survived long enough to an enemy 5 times their number. If fact, I think there was a problem with the chain of command or something, and Mehemed took advantage of that and made one last siege and there you go. What I am wondering is why the Christians didnt bolster the population more. England and France had the 100 years war right? What the hell were Germany and the rest of Europe doing?
During the Hundred Year' War (which, funnily enough, only lasted 70-80 years) Germany didn't exist.
Germany only came into existence in the 1860's. So did Italy. So they are both younger countries than even the US and Canada.
|
Constantinople
CKA Elite
Posts: 3854
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:25 am
GreatBriton GreatBriton: Tman1 Tman1: TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776: Tman1 Tman1: TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776: Tman1 Tman1: Its called Istanbul. Christians weren't willing to fight for it, they lost it fair and square. Nuff said. Oh, I'd say they were very willing to fight for it for well over a thousand years. The West just got caught up in their own internal battles when the Ottomans rose to power. (The Schism didn't help much either) Thats why they relied on the Venetians, who conquered it 300 years before to defend it? The population at the time was around 100,000 I think. Not exactly the pinnicle of Christianity anymore I would say. The Fourth Crusade was messed up. Anyway, up to the last day the Christian inhabitants gave it their all- even if they were lead by a Genoan. Oh no Im not denying they didnt give it their all in fact I am amazed they survived long enough to an enemy 5 times their number. If fact, I think there was a problem with the chain of command or something, and Mehemed took advantage of that and made one last siege and there you go. What I am wondering is why the Christians didnt bolster the population more. England and France had the 100 years war right? What the hell were Germany and the rest of Europe doing? During the Hundred Year' War (which, funnily enough, only lasted 70-80 years) Germany didn't exist. Germany only came into existence in the 1860's. So did Italy. So they are both younger countries than even the US and Canada.
But I think what he is referring to are the regions set out by the Treaty of Verdun in 843. There was a Germania prior to the 1860's, too.
|
Posts: 35280
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:29 am
Istanbul (Not Constantinople) Lyrics
$1: Istanbul was Constantinople Now it's Istanbul, not Constantinople Been a long time gone, Constantinople Now it's Turkish delight on a moonlit night
Every gal in Constantinople Lives in Istanbul, not Constantinople So if you've a date in Constantinople She'll be waiting in Istanbul
Even old New York was once New Amsterdam Why they changed it I can't say People just liked it better that way
So take me back to Constantinople No, you can't go back to Constantinople Been a long time gone, Constantinople Why did Constantinople get the works? That's nobody's business but the Turks
Istanbul (Istanbul) Istanbul (Istanbul)
Even old New York was once New Amsterdam Why they changed it I can't say People just liked it better that way
Istanbul was Constantinople Now it's Istanbul, not Constantinople Been a long time gone, Constantinople Why did Constantinople get the works? That's nobody's business but the Turks
So take me back to Constantinople No, you can't go back to Constantinople Been a long time gone, Constantinople Why did Constantinople get the works? That's nobody's business but the Turks
|
Posts: 9956
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:27 pm
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776: GreatBriton GreatBriton: Tman1 Tman1: TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776: Tman1 Tman1: TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776: Tman1 Tman1: Its called Istanbul. Christians weren't willing to fight for it, they lost it fair and square. Nuff said. Oh, I'd say they were very willing to fight for it for well over a thousand years. The West just got caught up in their own internal battles when the Ottomans rose to power. (The Schism didn't help much either) Thats why they relied on the Venetians, who conquered it 300 years before to defend it? The population at the time was around 100,000 I think. Not exactly the pinnicle of Christianity anymore I would say. The Fourth Crusade was messed up. Anyway, up to the last day the Christian inhabitants gave it their all- even if they were lead by a Genoan. Oh no Im not denying they didnt give it their all in fact I am amazed they survived long enough to an enemy 5 times their number. If fact, I think there was a problem with the chain of command or something, and Mehemed took advantage of that and made one last siege and there you go. What I am wondering is why the Christians didnt bolster the population more. England and France had the 100 years war right? What the hell were Germany and the rest of Europe doing? During the Hundred Year' War (which, funnily enough, only lasted 70-80 years) Germany didn't exist. Germany only came into existence in the 1860's. So did Italy. So they are both younger countries than even the US and Canada. But I think what he is referring to are the regions set out by the Treaty of Verdun in 843. There was a Germania prior to the 1860's, too.
Correct. I was assuming people knew I meant the Holy Roman Empire but I also meant the Germanic lands etc. I didn't mean as a nationality.
|
Posts: 4065
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 4:54 pm
$1: Istanbul was Constantinople Now it's Istanbul, not Constantinople Been a long time gone, Constantinople Why did Constantinople get the works? That's nobody's business but the Turks
enough said.... "ISTANBUL" my little friend
|
Constantinople
CKA Elite
Posts: 3854
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:54 pm
Constantinople.
|
The Hoser
CKA Elite
Posts: 3303
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:58 pm
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776: Constantinople.
Do we disagree on everything or is it intentional?
|
Constantinople
CKA Elite
Posts: 3854
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:59 pm
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck: TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776: Constantinople. Do we disagree on everything or is it intentional?
Some people are just total opposites.
|
Posts: 4065
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:49 pm
Constantinople Constantinople: Constantinople.
really..really... I find 2 cups of All bran per day will clear you out completely... never be constantinople again... LMAO
|
Posts: 9956
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:51 pm
Well, previous to my other saying, it should be called Byzantium, the original name it was given. The name Constantinople was given by a reformed Roman Emperor who gave up his life in the name of a God who gave him a vision of victory and imposed upon him the Edict of Milan. As soon as Constanine I became Emperor, the Roman Empire dwindled into a puny Christian state and faded. Sad.
|
The Hoser
CKA Elite
Posts: 3303
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:10 pm
Tman1 Tman1: Well, previous to my other saying, it should be called Byzantium, the original name it was given. The name Constantinople was given by a reformed Roman Emperor who gave up his life in the name of a God who gave him a vision of victory and imposed upon him the Edict of Milan. As soon as Constanine I became Emperor, the Roman Empire dwindled into a puny Christian state and faded. Sad.
Byzantium does sound cooler. Constantinople is probably the worst name it's ever had, so pussy and Christian and such. Turncoat time... Byzantium forever!!!
|
Posts: 9956
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:38 pm
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck: Tman1 Tman1: Well, previous to my other saying, it should be called Byzantium, the original name it was given. The name Constantinople was given by a reformed Roman Emperor who gave up his life in the name of a God who gave him a vision of victory and imposed upon him the Edict of Milan. As soon as Constanine I became Emperor, the Roman Empire dwindled into a puny Christian state and faded. Sad. Byzantium does sound cooler. Constantinople is probably the worst name it's ever had, so pussy and Christian and such. Turncoat time... Byzantium forever!!!
Well, you cannot deny its strengths as a Christian city it did last over a thousand years after the Roman Empire, but given time, all things must come to an end, it was the citys end. The Muslims wanted it more than the Christians, they got it, Christians lost it. The walls of Constantinople will forever stand as a bastion of Christian might against the onslaught of the Muslim horde.
|
|
Page 2 of 6
|
[ 90 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
|
|